- 101. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:07:51 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ I've noticed a similar effect on CW myself. Often I can copy CW better with a wide filter instead of a narrow one, even though the apparent n
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00327.html (8,333 bytes)
- 102. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:21:24 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ When I'm using a 250 Hz filter, quite often when two stations are within 10-20 Hz of each other and nearly the same strength, I can tune off
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00358.html (7,859 bytes)
- 103. Re: [RTTY] Inrad filters for rtty question (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:29:02 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ As long as one has an oscilloscope for tuning, it's easy to tell which way to tune based on the angle of the ellipse. It never takes me more
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00359.html (8,492 bytes)
- 104. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:41:38 -0800
- <snip> _________________________________________________________ Fascinating insight. Thanks, Kok. -- 73, Bill W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00361.html (8,913 bytes)
- 105. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:46:59 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ Quite correct. RTTY is a form of FM (think of a carrier being frequency modulated by a square wave) and as such, it has sidebands. For a 170
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00362.html (9,164 bytes)
- 106. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:48:58 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ You don't have to go to that expense. A TS-870S has near-perfect filters for RTTY. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _____________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00363.html (8,404 bytes)
- 107. Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 07:57:41 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ I think the best use of AFC is to have a separate tuning indicator such as an oscilloscope and do the tuning with it. Then when you have the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00364.html (9,338 bytes)
- 108. Re: [RTTY] Region III Band Plan (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:05:52 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ Here in Region II, the ARRL has designated 7040 as the RTTY DX calling frequency, while for decades 7040 has been recognized as the CW QRP ca
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00365.html (7,506 bytes)
- 109. Re: MMTTY AFC, O-scope (Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 08:41:19 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ I split the difference, tuning so the bars (ellipses) are equally "off". Seems to work ok as long as they don't exceed 200 Hz by much. It see
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00367.html (8,930 bytes)
- 110. Re: MMTTY AFC, O-scope (Re: [RTTY] Re: Noise with MMTTY (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:27:15 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ According to Brian, K6STI - whose opinion I highly respect - the wider shift provides more resistance to selective fading, as you mention abo
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00369.html (9,922 bytes)
- 111. Re: [RTTY] Filters (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 07:12:34 -0800
- _________________________________________________________ I think it does have to do with bandwidth, in the sense that if you have a very wide filter (500 Hz or more) tuning off to one side will not
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00404.html (8,228 bytes)
- 112. Re: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 09:03:12 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ It will be soon. I have stopped paper QSL's unless there is an SASE enclosed, and when I run out of my current supply of QSL's, I'll stop ent
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00047.html (8,406 bytes)
- 113. Re: [RTTY] DXP38 went Ooops need to explore new ways to do rtty andother modes (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:41:30 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ Of all the free programs, MMTTY is among the best if not the best. Download it at http://www.qsl.net/mmhamsoft/mmtty/ Don't be intimidated by
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00066.html (7,881 bytes)
- 114. Re: [RTTY] Mailing List (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:45:49 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ And why not, pray tell? Yahoo groups works fine for me - six different groups subscribed to with nary a problem. And you can't beat the price
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00067.html (7,684 bytes)
- 115. Re: [RTTY] Mailing List (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:45:53 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ www.groups.yahoo.com would be my guess. I subscribe to six different groups on yahoo and they all work fine. I see no reason for an individua
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00068.html (7,713 bytes)
- 116. Re: [RTTY] Spring Break RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:48:06 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ You might as well ask how are you going to QSL with those guys who never order blank QSLs. If they want to QSL via LoTW they will find a way.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00069.html (9,262 bytes)
- 117. Re: [RTTY] T33C (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:53:57 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ Please just indicate the actual RF frequency. If you're using FSK that should be what the dial says. With AFSK, who knows but you? :-) RF fre
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00070.html (7,732 bytes)
- 118. Re: [RTTY] Finally bit the bullet... (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 21:19:46 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ It is good, but getting it set up can be a bit tricky. Keep after it and do join the WriteLog reflector at contesting.com and also see Don's
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00071.html (7,294 bytes)
- 119. Re: DX Spotting was: [RTTY] T33C (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 08:58:19 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ C'mon guys, we all have our preferences for hamming. Personally, I admire KS0M for making Honor Roll the hard way. I still have two to go an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00125.html (9,314 bytes)
- 120. Re: [RTTY] RTTY QSOs in T33C online log (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 07:35:22 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ My RTTY Q's appeared within about 24 hours, same as CW/SSB. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW _______________________________________________ RTTY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00136.html (6,810 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu