Mail Archive Search: <+from:ww3s@zoominternet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ww3s@zoominternet.net: 197 ]

Total 197 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 00:23:56 -0400; I'm beginning to think some of this behaivor is generated from the NOW.....or NEXT....type of operating you see more of now....we use it, but only when we get more than one call from a CQ or TU, not; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00041.html (9,320 bytes)
122. [RTTY] split with FT-2000 (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:45:41 -0500; Anyone using a FT-2000? I cant get mine to go into transmit when in RTTY mode....SSB fine, CW fine, RTTY transcieve is fine....when I go split, and press the TX button in MMTTY, nothing....no PTT....; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-12/msg00053.html (6,332 bytes)
123. Re: [RTTY] WPX suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:44:21 -0500; and after you send # 598, just move to 600....eliminates the 599 599 599 and then "yea but whats my number?" And the Rules is: VI. Exchange: RST report plus a progressive contact serial number starti; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00079.html (9,629 bytes)
124. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY contest on Saturday February 23 (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:12:38 -0500 (EST); N1MM software now defaults to ASSISTED in the contest setup dialog. I think the rationale was the old default was single op, and many casual contesters would use the cluster or telnet spotting, and n; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00396.html (12,513 bytes)
125. Re: [RTTY] QRV during NAQP? (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:05:51 -0500; not sure I understand the question? Do you have an example? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty ___; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00423.html (8,084 bytes)
126. Re: [RTTY] QRV during NAQP? (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:56:30 -0500; well, you'd be wrong Lee....thats not the definition of assistance....if I work you and tell you I'm also qrv on 3577.5, thats me telling you, thru normal ham radio means, that I'm also on another fr; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00431.html (8,987 bytes)
127. [RTTY] thanks for the plaque(s) (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:36:07 -0400; Many thanks to CQ magazine, and Ed, W0YK, and others....received the plaques today for the North America Multi/Single LP category for the 2012 CQWW contest, nicely engraved with the new NA record !!!; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00045.html (6,981 bytes)
128. [RTTY] VP9 qth available for ARRL Roundup, Jan 2014 (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:41:41 -0400; due to unforeseen circumstances, Ill be unable to participate in the contest from Bermuda this year so Eds VP9GE qth is available. Although the antennas seem modest, the close proximity to the ocean,; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00046.html (6,840 bytes)
129. [RTTY] 2013 roundup results (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:46:33 -0400; So it sounds like my score reduction of 2.2% fits in with the norm, with the usual mix of NIL and mis-copied exchanges, etc.....I came in second in the DX low power category, but was surprised to see; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00075.html (8,030 bytes)
130. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 11:58:25 -0400; Most people seem to be quoting the old rules, the new PROPOSED definition, from the ARRL website: 2.1 No entrant may operate more than 24 hours out of the 30-hour contest period. 2.2 Operating Time w; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00044.html (10,313 bytes)
131. Re: [RTTY] contest change (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 21:32:10 -0400; It sounds like what they are saying, or at least what some people are interpreting the rules as: If you take a break, you must take 2, and they must be at least 30 minutes long....so what I have done; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00065.html (9,324 bytes)
132. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:12:31 -0400; whats any of this got to do with LOTW, as mentioned in the Subject ?!?!?! shouldn't get sidetracked, though. The issue at hand is excessive the time. Let me pose a question for the community. Lets sa; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00134.html (9,540 bytes)
133. Re: [RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:50:05 -0400; I'm pretty happy with the 3 Microkeyer devices I have, and NONE send "slow" rtty...... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00019.html (8,918 bytes)
134. [RTTY] log whats sent ? (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:12:10 -0400; How does log checking handle a callsign that more than likely sent their ITU zone, rather than their CQ zone.....for example a K1** that sent CT 08...when asked for his zone, he clearly sent 08.....l; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00052.html (6,359 bytes)
135. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:07:39 -0400; I'd be up for a petition type thing, however, I'm not sure signatures from out of the country would hold much weight, perhaps some comments from groups such as the RSGB or DARC or other countries ama; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00262.html (9,581 bytes)
136. Re: [RTTY] NP3D (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:06:32 -0500; oh my god, may he rest in peace....I met him several times at Dayton, and always enjoyed the conversations....... ... _._ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00023.html (8,435 bytes)
137. [RTTY] VP9 QTH available for ARRL RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Jamie WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:47:11 -0500; Due to a family emergency, I wont be able to make it to VP9 for the upcoming rtty roundup, the QTH of VP9GE is available for rent. Ed is a very gracious host, one should be able to break the DX LP re; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00026.html (6,780 bytes)
138. Re: [RTTY] RTTY RU - poor band condx (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:10:17 -0500; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00145.html (8,137 bytes)
139. Re: [RTTY] The Empire Strikes Back....... RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:12:29 -0500; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00146.html (10,607 bytes)
140. Re: [RTTY] Cut Numbers Revisited (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 18:19:07 -0500; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00147.html (8,906 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]