Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ww3s@zoominternet.net: 197 ]

Total 197 documents matching your query.

161. [RTTY] CQWW RTTY results (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:21:25 -0400
Any idea when the results will posted? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00109.html (6,155 bytes)

162. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:57:57 -0400
What I think usually happens is the skimmer cannot tell the difference between who is who.....so since most people now append their CQ message with CQ, it goes like this.... CQ AA5AU AA5AU CQ and the
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00147.html (8,802 bytes)

163. Re: [RTTY] Decoder performance on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:09:02 -0400
_______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00176.html (10,061 bytes)

164. Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:56:35 -0500
Google is your friend...... I pulled their website up, the times are in bold green at the top.....1200z to 1200z..... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00111.html (8,063 bytes)

165. [RTTY] BARTG sprint and SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:55:44 -0500
The band change rule for single ops pretty much rules out SO2R, no? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00115.html (6,212 bytes)

166. Re: [RTTY] Dayton RTTY Dinner? (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 18:36:00 -0500
havent heard much lately, but I if recall, there was a proposed informal type of dinner at the SPaghetti Warehouse on Thursday evening.... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00009.html (7,471 bytes)

167. Re: [RTTY] 40M RTTY band plans (score: 1)
Author: SHARON TOLBERT <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 15:45:21 -0500 (EST)
I saw quite a number of spots from guys grumbling about VP8SGI running RTTY on 7040 and that being a JT or some other digital mode special frequency. Guess they have not heard the rule with respect t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00053.html (18,681 bytes)

168. [RTTY] bandpass filters (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:20:47 -0400
Whats everyone using for low power rtty contesting? Anyone using Dunestar and pushing 100w to them? How about the newer Hamation 419? Or does everyone throttle back to 80-85w, or push 100w? _________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00075.html (6,964 bytes)

169. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone Ssetup Help (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 22:14:39 -0400
Ive never found 2Tone to be hands down better overall......at times it is better, but I dont see any significant improvement over MMTTY running the FIR profile....Ive seen several time when 2Tone had
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00125.html (9,349 bytes)

170. Re: [RTTY] [N1MMLoggerplus] RE: GRITTY (score: 1)
Author: SHARON TOLBERT <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Where is the LIKE button? -- Original Message -- From: Jim Brown k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com [N1MMLoggerplus] <N1MMLoggerplus@yahoogroups.com> To: N1MMLoggerplus@yahoogroups.com, VE3NEA' 'Alex <alshov
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00135.html (10,930 bytes)

171. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:47:05 -0400
maybe there could be on word that the consensus agrees on to use at the end, and that word could be eliminated from the ini file ????? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00211.html (9,479 bytes)

172. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 159, Issue 49 (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:44:57 -0400
not the issue Stan.....the problem is, when I send CQ WW3S WW3S CQ and then you send K4SBZ K4SBZ skimmer sees: CQ WW3S WW3S CQ K4SBZ K4SBZ and spots both of us on the same frequency......looking for
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00251.html (8,682 bytes)

173. [RTTY] test (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 19:10:04 -0400
anyone else unsubscribed recently? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00290.html (6,055 bytes)

174. Re: [RTTY] VK0EK From North Texas - RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:56:18 -0400
this is the second post Ive seen that says they end in 4-5 days.....arent they on until the 20th of April? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00027.html (7,661 bytes)

175. Re: [RTTY] VK0EK RTTY QSO Rate (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:28:51 -0400
I had Heard confirmed on several bands and modes from last time.....need them on RTTY, 160 and 80, but really would have been satisifed with RTTY.....still hoping, but not really.........I havent wor
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00043.html (8,449 bytes)

176. [RTTY] VK0EK, no joy in Mudville..... (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:33:21 -0400
make that Meadville.....took the morning off to try to work them on RTTY, looks like Ole Sol refused to cooperate.....better luck next time, if there is a next time ....... __________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00068.html (6,454 bytes)

177. Re: [RTTY] VK0EK and FT4JA (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:53:26 -0400
Dont need FT4 on rtty, so, as luck would have it, they have been ungodly on 30m.....one night on 30m cw, I swear they were bending the S meter......the VK0 is whisper quiet when they can be heard....
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00076.html (8,198 bytes)

178. [RTTY] VK0EK now on 10.137 (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 22:42:54 -0400
worked !!!! Thanks Don AA5AU for posting the guidelines today.......he went from being piss any weak, to perfect Q5 copy on 2tone, worked him second call, but took a while to confirm since KT8X doens
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00083.html (6,401 bytes)

179. Re: [RTTY] VK0EK RTTY Update (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 12:46:17 -0400
they worked a lot last evening, but then condx were better....I saw the first spot from a N1 aboout 0140 or so, and saw the corresponding call on DXA....never a whisper, and few, if any logged, on DX
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00093.html (8,784 bytes)

180. Re: [RTTY] VK0EK RTTY Update (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 13:06:05 -0400
That being said, how do we educate these newer ops on pileup etiquette? (if it is all newer ops?).....listening to the 4W pileup, trying to find the qsx, and they give a DL6 a 599 and K5 keeps givin
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-04/msg00094.html (7,895 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
This search system is powered by Namazu