Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wx4tm@tm-moore.com: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] Zone 2 for WAZ (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 13:12:31 -0500
I've worked VO2NS 15 times, according to my log, and have not received a single LOTW QSL! Tom WX4TM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00154.html (8,299 bytes)

62. Re: [RTTY] U.S.A CONTEST (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:08:02 -0500
I've been watching this thread. Its a reflection of whats wrong with much of our society today. I'm old and running out of patience with it. Everyone seems to want to quickly blame the contest rules,
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00134.html (11,115 bytes)

63. Re: [RTTY] [N1MM] N1MM Cabrillo format error (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:16:37 -0500
Where in the rules does it say "in that order"? It doesn't. It may imply it or suggest it, but it doesn't say that. It just says what has to be included in the exchange. READ the rule again. Tom WX4T
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00305.html (9,888 bytes)

64. Re: [RTTY] [N1MM] N1MM Cabrillo format error (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:39:46 -0500
Absolutely. That's where the rules, i.e, the example given, are very clear. Its my responsibility as the operator to make sure my software complies with the rules. If it doesn't, my problem should be
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-09/msg00320.html (9,912 bytes)

65. [RTTY] Fw: [Acg] Chance for Input on Proposed Rule Changes for CQ WPX Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:39:51 -0500
-- Original Message -- From: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com> To: "John Laney" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>; "secc" <secc@contesting.com>; "ACG" <acg@alabamacontestgroup.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00063.html (9,164 bytes)

66. Re: [RTTY] 80M WAS RTTY ALL LOTW (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:14:00 -0600
Les KL7J was also the last I needed on 80M RTTY for my 5BWAS RTTY. Waited a year for that one QSO. As a result I just recently received 5BWAS Certificate #2933 with no reference to mode; and 'digital
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00036.html (8,581 bytes)

67. Re: [RTTY] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:50:27 -0500
That's okay, Mike. Just goes to show we humans are not perfect and everyone makes mistakes every now and then. I, and I'm sure others, have made the same mistake - probably more than once. I made a s
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00270.html (14,512 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 67
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu