Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+\[digitalradio\]\s+Why\s+$and\s+How$\s+You\s+Should\s+Urge\s+the\s+FCC\s+to\s+Reject\s+the\s+ARRL\'s\s+Symbol\s+Rate\s+Petition\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+\[digitalradio\]\s+Why\s+$and\s+How$\s+You\s+Should\s+Urge\s+the\s+FCC\s+to\s+Reject\s+the\s+ARRL\'s\s+Symbol\s+Rate\s+Petition\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] [digitalradio] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1): Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 03:32:55 -0500; I agree that the 300 baud symbol rate limitation should be raised, Steve, but this should be accomplished without making the interference from automatic stations situation worse as the ARRLs petition; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00041.html (9,822 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] [digitalradio] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1): Author: "Rick Muething" <rmuething@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 09:31:29 -0500; Dave, Each is entitled to his opinion and you can file yours with a proper response to the FCC proposed rule change RM-11708. A comment response to a proposed rule change doesn't have to be particula; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00043.html (13,732 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] [digitalradio] Why (and How) You Should Urge the FCC to Reject the ARRL's Symbol Rate Petition (score: 1): Author: "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 17:56:33 -0500; From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Muething Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2013 9:31 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; rtty@contesting.com; DX-; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00044.html (18,842 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]