Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160\s+RTTY\s+WAS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160\s+RTTY\s+WAS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 160 RTTY WAS (score: 1): Author: Thomas Giella <kn4lf@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:37:33 -0600; My 160 RTTY WAS total is 39, the reason why I would like to see more RTTY operation whether via contest or ragchew. 73 & GUD DX,Thomas F. Giella, KN4LFLakeland, FL, USAkn4lf1@arrl.net PODXS 070 Club; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00203.html (6,808 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY WAS (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:53:36 -0500; When we all have one of these, WAS should be no problem? More giant antennas of the North from OH6KN on a tower of more than 100 meters. Jukka says this monster will be in full operation by the summe; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00205.html (6,802 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 160 RTTY WAS (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:41:08 -0800; As a matter of fact, I met the guys from ARRL - LoTW specialists this May in Dayton and asked them why we do not have 160 meters RTTYmode in LoTW? I was told that there was no inquires regarding this; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00206.html (8,521 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]