Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160m\s+digital\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+160m\s+digital\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 160m digital QSO Party (score: 1): Author: "Dallmeier, Walter" <walter.dallmeier@dl4rck.de>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:57:39 +0100; Hello RTTY-fellows, the "160m digital QSO Party" went on one week more, until So. 26. Dec. 23:59z. Many thanks for so many participation around the world. Hope to work stateside next week. See you on; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00183.html (6,730 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 160m digital QSO Party (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <adye@windstream.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:24:24 -0500; The band was a bit noisy here early last evening but quieted down later. The problem was the lack of activity. I operated sporadically during the periods of 2200Z to 0100Z and 0300Z to 0400Z. I did m; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00196.html (7,943 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 160m digital QSO Party (score: 1): Author: Dick <aa5vu@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:37:54 -0600; Carl WA2ETU, I just checked my LoTW and you are correct. I was surprised that under the WAS awards it tracks RTTY on most bands with the exception of 160 Meters. Dick AA5VU PS: You were not as strong; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00198.html (7,829 bytes)
4. [RTTY] 160m digital QSO Party (score: 1): Author: Dick <aa5vu@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:39:11 -0600; Carl WA2ETU, I just checked my LoTW and you are correct. I was surprised that under the WAS awards it tracks RTTY on most bands with the exception of 160 Meters. Dick AA5VU PS: You were not as strong; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00199.html (7,093 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]