- 1. [RTTY] 5-Band RTTY WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:33:42 -0600
- There never was a RTTY Honor Roll for DXCC either until Jules - W2JGR/Ø (sk) petitioned the ARRL to create this category. Here's what he said in his biography: "RTTY DXCC HONOR ROLL One achiev
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00047.html (9,285 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] 5-Band RTTY WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:49:59 -0500
- Bob, Not to be a heretic but why should there be a 5BWAS RTTY when the rules say: "There are no specialty 5 Band awards or endorsements." That means there is no 5BWAS-Phone, 5BWAS-CW or even "5BWAS-
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00054.html (11,988 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] 5-Band RTTY WAS (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 02:47:45 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- That's what we pay our dues and award fees for. Any director who objects, vote him out. In fact, I'd take it a giant step further and make ALL awards available p
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00055.html (7,191 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] 5-Band RTTY WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:12:10 -0600
- Joe, Actually, *I* am the one suggesting heresy, not you. But before we get started, I thought you, me, Bill, and others should watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SEVuSZDIcI&feature=re
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00071.html (9,485 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] 5-Band RTTY WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:32:07 -0800
- Hi Joe Well, I have WAS, and it is noted on the certificate that it is a RTTY WAS Tom W7WHY You are really asking that the entire 5B WAS award be redesigned to support specialty awards and endorsemen
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00082.html (7,491 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] 5-Band RTTY WAS (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:39:08 -0500
- Bob, I don't have an argument against adding single mode versions of 5BWAS (although in this day I would argue that it should be 9BWAS <G>) if they are added for all three major mode groups (CW, SSB,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00088.html (11,624 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu