Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+559\s+instead\s+of\s+599\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+559\s+instead\s+of\s+599\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 559 instead of 599 (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:13:40 -0500 (EST); Hi, Do you think it's possible these stations just made a typo in their macros? Typing 559 by accident instead of 599. I don't know all the ways of generating macros. I use MMTTY by itself and when s; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00384.html (7,148 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 559 instead of 599 (score: 1): Author: <walt@hawaii.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:18:12 -0800; Hi All, I typically fill in all the static parts of the macro rather than use shortcut characters, mostly because I can't remember them all and would need to look them up at the start of each contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00402.html (8,015 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 559 instead of 599 (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:25:34 -0500 (EST); And there's the famous T0M episode. I had forgotten about that. 73 Kermit (aka Ken), AB1J In a message dated 1/13/2011 2:18:16 A.M. GMT Standard Time, walt@hawaii.rr.com writes: Hi All, I typically f; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00404.html (7,327 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 559 instead of 599 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:31:33 -0600; I saw one kind intentioned individual asking for a resend of the RST - I guess the SEC was copied OK. Now most guys I am guessing would use human assistance to get the interpretation. But I guess thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00457.html (8,758 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]