Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+5Band\s+WAS\s+for\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+5Band\s+WAS\s+for\s+RTTY\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] 5Band WAS for RTTY (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:19:52 -0500; I was not aware that the ARRL offered a 5BWAS with a RTTY endorsement? I managed 5BWAS in 1979 but was under the impression it could not be endorsed. Maybe this is something new with LoTW? 73, Dick; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00176.html (7,432 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 5Band WAS for RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:48:55 -0400; Dick Kriss wrote: "I was not aware that the ARRL offered a 5BWAS with a RTTY endorsement?" Same here. IMHO, 5BWAS RTTY would be just for the operator/station, and not endorsable, by ARRL? C'Ya, Shelb; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00177.html (6,492 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 5Band WAS for RTTY (score: 1): Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:26:07 -0700 (PDT); I want to complete Mixed Mode 5 Bands WAS (well, 90 percents QSO's are in RTTY) using hybrid-Lotw and paper QSL's. 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D I was not aware that the ARRL offered a 5BWAS with a RTTY end; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00178.html (7,960 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 5Band WAS for RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:29:30 -0700; You are corrert Shelby. Only for the operator's own satisfaction. I received my RTTY-WAS (#352) and endorsements (10-15-20-40-80) and 5B-WAS with the same cards, no LoTW. Just my own self satisfactio; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-04/msg00179.html (8,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]