Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+9M0L\s+18103\s+up\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+9M0L\s+18103\s+up\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:57:29 -0600; begging _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00115.html (6,312 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:57:18 -0500; Can't work 'em if you can't hear 'em. Actually heard them a lot, just not strong enough to print! 73, Don AA5AU begging _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00116.html (7,801 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:13:39 -0500; Their choice of times and bands hasn't favored East Central Iowa up to now. Of course, I had a meeting and had to be away from the radio tonight, when it sounds like I may have had a chance to print; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00117.html (8,597 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:48:04 -0600; Don, They came up when I worked them. Otherwise I was only getting partial prints. zippo on 15 today and no cpy on 17 cw.. Colorado and Louisiana the new black hole. Mike W0MU W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00118.html (8,094 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: "Nelson Moyer" <ku0a@mchsi.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:51:42 -0500; I don't understand why 9M0L never works NA on 20 meters at the predicted opening between 1300-1700 UTC. They seem to prefer to run EU on 15, 12 or 10 meter during our 20 meter openings. Actually, our; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00125.html (10,407 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 06:35:09 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I do not speak for 9M0L of course, but often when a DXPedition ignores what should be an easy opening, it's because the pileups are too unruly. I have seen this more and more; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00126.html (8,543 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:51:03 -0400; RTTY Dx ing has gotten out of hand lately...the number of well known stations that continue to call on top of others is growing....and many are on this email list.....I can almost understand a K4ABC; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00127.html (7,993 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] 9M0L 18103 up (score: 1): Author: Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:26:22 -0400; One of the major reasons that stations keep calling a DXpedition station after they've called some else is simply the length of the DXpedition's transmission, which is usually CALLSIGN 599 CALLSIGN.; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00141.html (8,642 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]