Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+BOD\s+minutes\s+published\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+ARRL\s+BOD\s+minutes\s+published\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 10:54:50 -0800; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: How would you allow for pirates? I remember one contest a few years ago when a pirate, using a well known callsign, caused havoc for hours on end. Bill W; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00249.html (9,613 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:41:01 -0500; I'm sure that if one is properly logging his/her operations- or was otherwise able to prove the operations were not from his/her station - that it would be no problem. While logging is not a require; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00250.html (10,657 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] ARRL BOD minutes published (score: 1): Author: "Scott Schultz" <schultz0530@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:13:39 -0600; Perhaps ARRL needs to beef up the OO program and start issuing "cards" again for bad operating. Amen! It was at least 20 years ago, maybe more, but at the July meeting of our friendly neighborhood ra; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00251.html (10,914 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 23
Page: [1] [2]