Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+CONDX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+CONDX\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:42:53 -0500; I was afraid that this was going to happen! 10 meters is dead here in the U.P. Solar flare today and predicted for the next two days. I have had great propagation on 10 for two weeks, Asia Erope, Afr; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00049.html (7,117 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:00:20 -0700; I agree totally! 10 was SO good over the past week or so... Alas, it is dead now... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://g; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00053.html (9,008 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:07:25 -0700 (PDT); Tom, don't despair. Contests have a knack for "opening" the bands. There have been several M class flares in the past five days, but the forecast is for low A and K index numbers this weekend and a S; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00054.html (9,095 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: Fabi <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:47:12 -0400; Yep, I agree with Don, we can't be too choosy, remember 5-6-7 years back when 20M was the ONLY band until 40 and 80 would open up later in the evening? We still had a blast. Let's take advantage of w; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00058.html (10,105 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:53:48 -0700; And there is talk of a Maunder Minimum being in play now... If that correct, the next 70 years will be very bad... That means that the next generation of hams may never even see a decent cycle, and f; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00059.html (12,032 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:09:29 -0700 (PDT); The Maunder Minimum discussion is interesting but I certainly don't see how they can predict this with much accuracy. At the present, some scientists put the odds of going into a minimum at 25-30%. T; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00062.html (14,309 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:26:11 -0700; Hi Don, I sure hope you are correct! The thought that this might be my last cycle is very depressing. -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW sup; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00063.html (15,604 bytes)
8. [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: "Thomas W4HM" <w4hm@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:41:19 -0400; I have made dozens of DX RTTY contacts this week on 10 meters using 100 watts. Also many dozens more on JT65A and JT9. I personally didn't see poor radio wave propagation conditions from here in Flor; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00064.html (8,243 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] BARTG CONDX (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:02:52 -0500; I'm certain that 92% of the "talk" about a solar minima comes from hams. We do know that the sun is about 5 billion years old (give or take). Assuming that the solar cycle has been averaging 11 years; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00065.html (8,875 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]