Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+rule\s+changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BARTG\s+rule\s+changes\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: Gordon Bousman <nw7d.ham@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:59:29 -0800; Let me see if I understand the BARTG 2017 rule changes correctly: 1) SOAB ops can no longer use amplifiers (100w limit) but yet the Multi stations will still be allowed to use amplifiers. In this per; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00160.html (8,272 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:04:15 +0000; Wouldnt it have just been better and easier to have the categories name SOAB LP and SOAB HP and so on? There will be people who will be extremely confused and some that wont look at the rules, having; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00161.html (9,102 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:16:22 -0600; The whining has commenced! I will send my occasional reminder that in no jurisdiction with which I am familiar (certainly not under the US FCC, at least until its abolishment) are radioamateurs *requ; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00162.html (8,207 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: <scottmcleman36@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:21:12 +0000; I didnt say I didnt like the rules. Just the naming of the categories may cause some confusion for some regulars, who are potentially unaware of the rule changes. I thought the whole point was to enc; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00163.html (9,038 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 18:41:21 +0000; So the way I read the rule changes... My peanut whistle of a station will be using 1 transmitter of 100 watts output and operates all bands will be in the SOAB category. Right? If in the future of I; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00164.html (9,855 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:50:03 -0800; My understanding is that SO2R goes into SOE just like it always has. SO2R has not been allowed in SOAB for as long as I can remember. I didn't see anything in the PR that changed that. Let's relax an; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00165.html (7,830 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Simone Wilson" <m0box@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:55:01 -0500; Guys, Of course I knew this would promote debate, and in essence I'm not about to get into one here, but let me respond to one or two concerns. @Gordon NW7D - SOAB and Multi-whatever classes do not c; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00166.html (9,681 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] BARTG rule changes (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:10:49 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Just be sure your second radio has an "off" switch. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-11/msg00167.html (8,002 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]