Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Band\s+Plan\s+Points\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Band\s+Plan\s+Points\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:32:40 -0500; Here are some general thoughts and concerns that can be used in preparing your own response to the ARRL band plan committee. Please copy your directors with your inputs. Unattended Digital Stations n; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00314.html (12,960 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 18:40:58 -0400; Re " The busy frequency detectors deployed by unattended digital stations are not effective." What leads you to this conclusion? 73, Dave, AA6YQ Here are some general thoughts and concerns that can b; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00316.html (13,307 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:12:51 -0500; Hi Dave, I got back on the air late last year after a 5 year period of station building. The major change that I noticed was that no matter where I operated (except for 10 meters) , I was QRMed by un; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00323.html (15,380 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 21:26:28 -0400; Hi Dave, I got back on the air late last year after a 5 year period of station building. The major change that I noticed was that no matter where I operated (except for 10 meters) , I was QRMed by u; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00325.html (9,078 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 20:43:13 -0500; The ARRL's definition of a band plan is " A band plan refers to a voluntary division of a band to avoid interference between incompatible modes.". (ref: http://www.arrl.org/band-plan). I believe the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00326.html (9,826 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:40:43 -0700; That's fairly easy, Dave. When you are operating and a WL2K station clobbers you off a frequency you know it doesn't work. What leads you to conclude that they do work or that they actually are emplo; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00327.html (8,277 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:43:01 -0700; On 3/29/2014 6:26 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote: That's because they aren't using busy frequency detectors, not because the ones they're using don't work. The busy frequency detectors incorporated in WinMor a; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00328.html (8,634 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: " Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@ambersoft.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:53:15 -0400; That's fairly easy, Dave. When you are operating and a WL2K station clobbers you off a frequency you know it doesn't work. What leads you to conclude that they do work or that they actually are empl; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00329.html (8,321 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Band Plan Points (score: 1): Author: "George Henry" <ka3hsw@att.net>; Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 23:09:55 -0500; I'll chime in on this one... I tested the PC-ALE program a couple of years ago and, while its busy-channel detection worked well for other ALE signals, it would key up over just about every other typ; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00330.html (9,071 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]