Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Baud\s+racing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Baud\s+racing\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:01:33 -0400 (EDT); Hi Bill, What was the outcome of your sked with N2WK? I had to run to the airport and entertain guests during that time, so I couldn't take lurk & listen. 73, Kermit, AB1J In a message dated 6/6/2011; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00042.html (6,608 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:20:39 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Nothing over 110 baud worked at all. I suspect the problem lies with either MMTTY or Windows itself however, since even my own transmitted text would not print correctly over; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00043.html (7,640 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: " pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:35:07 -0700; Hi all, Well, after seeing Bill's post about Baud racing, I decided to check out my PC. I'm running MMTTY under Win7Pro (32Bit) with an Intel Pentium III Xeon (dual core) at 2600MHz for each core, wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00044.html (7,076 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 13:22:15 -0400; In my experimenting days, years ago, I tinkered with AEA modems as well as KAM and MFJ. This was in the time of the RTTY Journal when I wrote the PACTOR column for Dale Sinner. I was able to use RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00045.html (9,082 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: Russell Blair <russell_blair86@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 10:54:01 -0700 (PDT); I was running HRD at 300 baud 170 shift 5 bit and someone said it might be better to be at 7 bit,and had a short qso with KC2RXS the other nite but the band was going out in Texas... Russell NC5O " I; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00046.html (8,339 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki@hvc.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:30:10 +0000; I think it was Kok that mentioned it. Bill (W6WRT) and I had gone up to 110. After that, gibberish. I was using an I7 900 processor with 12 gig ram and a video card with 1 gig on Win 7 64 bit so no l; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00048.html (9,813 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:34:12 -0700; I suspect there could be some filters inside MMTTY. Someone who knows how to, can check on that. As I mentioned earlier, a 300 baud RTTY signal with a 170 Hz shift requires a bandwidth that is in the; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00049.html (8,501 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Baud racing (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:27:53 -0700; All this stuff about faster baud rate RTTY brings up a subject that more people should be made aware of. That not all digital modes require the same bandwidth to transmit the same number of bits per; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-06/msg00050.html (9,697 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]