Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BoD\s+votes\s+LoTW\s+initiatives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+BoD\s+votes\s+LoTW\s+initiatives\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:50:39 -0400; Symbol Rate Rule Modernization On the motion of ARRL West Gulf Division Director Dr David Woolweaver, K5RAV, on behalf of the Ad Hoc Symbol Rate Rule Modernization Committee, the Board directed ARRL; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00100.html (10,792 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:28:55 -0500; K5RAV operates a Winlink RMS station. Here we go again with the *linkers and emcomm weenies trying a spectrum grab as if the frequencies they 'own' aren't enough. Sorry but this is a hot button issue; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00101.html (9,942 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:36:23 -0700; Sorry - Winlink ain't radio!!!!!!!!!! Let them go set up their own little computer networks somewhere else. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00102.html (6,975 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:11:21 -0500; They do have their own network Tom, it's called Sailmail. The *linkers tend to be a closed society too, try signing up to one of their reflectors. I got booted off one for asking, politely, the wrong; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00103.html (8,102 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:58:24 -0400; Let them go set up their own little computer networks somewhere else. 73 Tom W7WHY FSK RTTY !!!!!!! The ONLY way to fly... 27.950 mhz is a good place for WINLINK....Tom 73 Tony WA4JQS Anthony W. DePr; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00105.html (7,834 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM <wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:58:34 -0400; All, FYI-- Here is the response I received today, 7/24/2013 from K1ZZ, the CEO of the ARRL Re my strong objection to the ARRL 2.8KHz bandwidth proposal for digital modes in all the HF bands.........; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00110.html (9,064 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:37:13 -0500; Well that's about what I expected. The ARRL failed with the band allocations by bandwidth (Winlink wars) and now it looks like they are trying an end run to get the wideband junk everywhere. Did anyo; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00113.html (11,131 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "W4GKM" <w4gkm@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:57:08 -0500; I emailed my director but I doubt that we will get any support from him as well. This is very upsetting to me and many of my friends. Nick w4gkm Well that's about what I expected. The ARRL failed wit; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00114.html (12,482 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:04:07 -0700; Ah! I see a couple of silver lining, guys. Can you imagine what we can do with a 2 kHz FSK shift?! Selective fading can be fully eradicated. A CW station can also no longer QRM your QSO. We can go to; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00115.html (9,050 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:41:09 -0400; It is legal today for a signal with multiple carriers, each with multiple-bit-per-symbol modulation, to be considerably wider than 2.8 kHz. Dave is full of it ... such a modulation would constitute a; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00116.html (11,087 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:42:58 -0400; Germany has fewer than on tenth the number of licensees as the US. The number using such bandwidth wasting and QRM generating modes in not significantly large to create a problem although there is a; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00117.html (13,015 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:35:50 -0400; Dave, When multiple carriers are used to spread data over a range, they become a narrow band spread spectrum system (e.g ROS) which is illegal. You are well aware of the issues with ROS. In any case; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00118.html (13,107 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 23:59:33 -0400; No, the Bord's proposal substantially increases bandwidth over systems generally in use in the spectrum currently not allocated for phone and image use. In that spectrum, bandwidth in excess of 500; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00123.html (17,230 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:40:52 -0500; Come on, Joe. Call a spade a spade - they are quasi-commercial internet email gateways for sailors with no 97.113 filtering or ability for anyone else to do same. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00124.html (8,940 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:44:27 -0500; Oh come on Peter. Are you going to make a ham who happens at the time to be at sea use a commercial service just to let friends and family know where he is at? He's a ham got God's shakes. Dont put a; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00125.html (9,424 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:51:11 -0400; Not to beat a dead horse, however there are two unrelated factors at work. First, there supposed limits on message content. Who reviews messages handled by third party forwarding? How are violations; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00126.html (10,712 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:20:50 -0400; Are you going to make a ham who happens at the time to be at sea use a commercial service just to let friends and family know where he is at? Not to tell his friends and family where he is. However,; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00127.html (11,582 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:36:48 -0700; The answer to that question is right there in the FCC Rules on your bookshelf (or computer file). Except during emergencies, anything that is not covered in Part 97.1 of the FCC regulations cannot be; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00128.html (9,891 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:51:13 -0700; There is a huge difference. You'd originally mentioned private messages to friends and relatives. APRS is for public consumption. Anyone can read your position -- as the amateur service should be. If; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00130.html (9,353 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] BoD votes LoTW initiatives (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:25:12 -0500; Despite the watering down that has occurred over the years, 97.113 prohibits encryption in any circumstance except telecommand of a station in space operation. No exception for emergencies, nor shoul; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-07/msg00131.html (9,569 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]