Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+CQ\s+or\s+QRZ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+CQ\s+or\s+QRZ\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 08:20:53 -0500; Hello Group. Still wondering why guys use QRZ when they want to say CQ QRZ = Who is calling me CQ = General call If I hear someone sending QRZ, I will wait because he may heard someone calling him? b; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00195.html (7,607 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:26:22 -0500; I think QRZ has morphed from the original use of "Who is calling me" to a general purpose "Who else is there". QRZ? refers to the former use, while plain old QRZ refers to the latter. With voice, it'; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00198.html (8,630 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Cheryl Whitlock <cherwhit@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:39:22 -0600; I use QRZ at the end of the exchange with a station to ask if there are any other stations on frequency that want to call me. I use the CQ macro if no one comes back and I have to put out another gen; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00200.html (8,475 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: "Clint Talmadge W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:51:37 -0600; Thanks - that is the way I have always understood it. Clint Talmadge - W5CPT Hello Group. Still wondering why guys use QRZ when they want to say CQ QRZ = Who is calling me CQ = General call If I hear; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00201.html (8,298 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:56:23 -0500 (EST); Hi everyone, This brings up an interesting semantic point, but I think everyone knows what's going on. Even so, I may change my running QRZ to CQ to save a character. I enjoyed this contest a lot. Th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00203.html (7,500 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:22:51 -0500; Hi, I think that in contest pretty much everybody should use the same format in their macros. Macros should be predictable. With ragchewing macros we can be crative, very welcome in fact, but in cont; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00213.html (9,691 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:17:49 -0800 (PST); I use QRZ, but in looking at the meaning of Q signals, I probably should use QRV - "I'm ready to receive", after my TU. Do you think QRV instead of QRZ would confuse people while I'm running? I don't; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00218.html (10,764 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:21:53 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Either one will work but Claude is correct in that QRZ? is supposed to be used when you hear a station calling but have not yet got his call. CQ is a request for anyone to ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00219.html (8,482 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:14:41 -0500; Quite a suprising reading of QRZ... I for one always suggested like this. If I finish a QSO and immidiately after Bye-Bye I start calling, CQ, it would sound just rough and unpollite. Just like I wou; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00246.html (8,750 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:17:03 -0500; I usually use "CQ" at the end of a QSO, just because it is shorter, then "QRZ?" -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - World Wide Rating Please visit: www.k4fo.com/cqrtt; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00263.html (9,634 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:04:24 -0800; Fabi is spot on as usual. Its not the the waiting station, its for the tuning station. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00283.html (11,266 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:23:15 -0800 (PST); Well Tony, I'm going to change my TU macro from QRZ to QRV just to be technically correct. Then at least people who really know exactly what the Q-signals mean will send me their call right away inst; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00289.html (11,627 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:44:34 -0500; Languages evolve over time, and the Q signal set (now 98 years old) is just another language. Whatever somebody wrote in the dictionary when the language was young may or may not apply today. Many ol; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00301.html (9,731 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: "Andy Swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:33:45 +0000; No! I'm surprised so many old hands are getting this basically wrong and there is so much debate about this. QRZ - Who is calling me? It sends the clear message that you're hearing someone calling yo; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00334.html (9,246 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:53:16 -0800; When I'm running I often have multiple stations responding to me. I end my TU with a QRZ. If no one responds, I send a CQ. The use of QRZ by running contest and DX stations has become so prevalent th; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00336.html (9,839 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:09:14 -0800; I agree. As someone who predominantly S&P (I didn't issue a single CQ during this Roundup), I don't care what you send as long as I can tell that you are listening for other stations again. You can s; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00340.html (9,336 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: "Andy Swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:16:00 +0000; Correct No, just polite and good operators. This is what I do when someone gives a qrz. AND, when I QRZ and pouncers do pounce and I can still hear the original caller I ignore them and persist with; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00343.html (10,111 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:25:39 -0800 (PST); Andy, I have to agree with you. The "we've always done it that way" syndrome isn't really an excuse for even slightly sloppy operating practice. But then, I wouldn't complain about it very much, sinc; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00345.html (10,899 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:08:44 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: If you call CQ 2000 times in a contest, saving one character gives you an extra 5.6 minutes. How many more stations can you work in 5.6 minutes? The very first RTTY contest I; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00388.html (8,392 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:24:28 -0600; No, no, Bill. I'm being told that making your macros as efficient as possible, both to increase your own score, and as a courtesy to others, is wrong. In fact, "73 GL" is considered by some to be rud; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00394.html (9,138 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]