Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+CQWW\s+RTTY\s+and\s+Texas\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+CQWW\s+RTTY\s+and\s+Texas\s+QSO\s+Party\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQWW RTTY and Texas QSO Party (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:07:20 -0700 (PDT); FYI, there is (or was) an ongoing discussion on the CQ Contest reflector regarding RTTY interference to the Texas QSO Party (mostly 40 meters). http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Probably nothi; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00050.html (7,316 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY and Texas QSO Party (score: 1): Author: "Neal Campbell" <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:23:07 +0000; Very interesting and for the most part very reasonable. I think until the world aligns around a 40m band definition, we will always have problems there (when I lived in BE, it was very difficult to w; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00051.html (7,873 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]