Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Comments\s+by\s+K4SBZ\.\.\s+\(JT65\/JT9\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:13:09 -0500
Stan and the group, I have to disagree with your statement about us being of a limited mindset! My opinion is that most RTTY users will have tried, and probably use, many of the digital modes going.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00071.html (8,278 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Dave Greig <daven3buo@att.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:59:25 -0600
I personally run many of the Digital modes and have been a long time RTTY operator. But, This is the same argument that we RTTY'er have when there is a CW contest..... By thw way I don't work many CW
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00078.html (10,157 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:39:39 -0600
I also run other digital modes such as PSK31, JT65 and JT9. I just recently completed 8BWAS (10-80M) all on JT65 and all confirmed via LoTW. So I've actually been more active on the JT-modes lately t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00086.html (11,570 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:19:25 -0600
I really don't understand the guys complaining about contest activity. Especially when we are talking about traditions that have run for decades. The fact is that there is generally NOT a contest of
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00089.html (10,970 bytes)

5. [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 20:23:24 -0600
I really don't understand the guys complaining about contest activity. Especially when we are talking about traditions that have run for decades. The fact is that there is generally NOT a contest of
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00091.html (10,560 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 21:41:45 -0500
True story: During the CQ WW or WPX phone contest last year, a guy starts calling CQ DX on, maybe, 28.600. Now, the frequency is already occupied by a non-US station running in the contest and there
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00093.html (12,246 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Comments by K4SBZ.. (JT65/JT9) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:13:54 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: For what it's worth - I no longer operate RTTY below .080, as Don mentions above. The PSK and JT crowd have been very good about staying below 080 and I thin
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00097.html (8,342 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu