Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Contest\s+Macros\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Contest\s+Macros\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Contest Macros (score: 1): Author: edw3nr@nexband.com (Ed); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:46:30 -0500; What is the general opinion on using a LF before and after contest macros. ? Is this a good operating practice or just another way to slow things down.? The upcoming BARTG will be only my 2nd attempt; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00285.html (7,045 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Contest Macros (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:07:00 -0800; _________________________________________________________ You should put something after the last character in your macro in order to separate your information from the noise. Otherwise the other guy; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00287.html (7,671 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Contest Macros (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:18:18 -0600; ? down.? I'm certainly not a major player. But here is my take. Adding a LF (line feed) at the beginning and end of a buffer add X amount of time to the buffer. For the Big Hitters, that computes to; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00288.html (8,489 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Contest Macros (score: 1): Author: "Ted Huf" <ted@w4ze.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:42:51 -0400; I also get some really strange replies during RTTY contests. When I got started in RTTY contesting, I tried to follow the way others did their exchanges and calls. The best place that I have found to; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00426.html (6,604 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]