Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+DESREVER\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: "James" <semaj@suwanneevalley.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:12:57 -0400
Reversed Signal. I am confused. My RTTY Elmer some 34 years ago Said that the "standard" was LSB on all bands. FSK was the best way to send RTTY. AFSK is O K if you do it right. I built a two Xtal to
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00162.html (7,191 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:47:32 -0700
_________________________________________________________ The only real standard that should be adhered to is that the RF MARK frequency should be higher than the RF SPACE frequency. How you get ther
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00164.html (7,144 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:24:07 -0700
On Oct 15, 2004, at 5:12 PM, James wrote: Reversed Signal. I am confused. My RTTY Elmer some 34 years ago Said that the "standard" was LSB on all bands. The only Amateur standard I know of is the one
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00165.html (7,554 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:48:38 -0000
Unless people start spotting the suppressed carrier frequency displayed on their fancy rigs as "the" frequency on the DX-Clutsers. 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de ______________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00166.html (6,989 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:42:23 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Good point. The correct frequency to spot is the frequency of the MARK signal as it is transmitted. When using AFSK, whatever the radio dial
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00167.html (7,323 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:20:33 -0400
I agree with everything Bill, Chen and Goetz have just posted, and would like to add one more comment: AFAIK, by far the easiest way to get your TX and RX out of whack with each other is to use FSK w
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00168.html (9,593 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:35:34 -0500
hmmmm, that's not been my experience at all Richard. I use a FT1000MP which has a menu bug. You have to set the menu to 'reverse' for it to send FSK right side up. Now I do use MMTTY, both stand alon
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00169.html (10,740 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@rac.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 11:23:06 -0400
At 09:35 AM 16/10/2004, FireBrick wrote: hmmmm, that's not been my experience at all Richard. I use a FT1000MP which has a menu bug. You have to set the menu to 'reverse' for it to send FSK right sid
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00170.html (9,923 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:31:56 -0700
On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:20 AM, Richard Ferch wrote: In particular, I believe recent Kenwood and Yaesu radios assume the opposite polarity to the one assumed by JE3HHT in MMTTY, so on these radios you h
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00171.html (9,265 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu