- 1. [RTTY] DJ3IW and NAQP (long) (score: 1)
- Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:17:09 -0000
- Well, since others posted their "results", here is my "achievement". I intended to make as many QSOs as possible. Finding 15m almost without NA stations at start time, 20m seemed not to be open yet,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00282.html (8,884 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] DJ3IW and NAQP (long) (score: 1)
- Author: ekki@plicht.de (Ekki Plicht)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:55:29 +0000
- Am Montag, 22. Juli 2002 11:17 schrieb DJ3IW Goetz: [results...] [...] Hi Goetz, I experienced the same... heard some NA stations, mostly on 40m, but they couldn't hear me. My guess is reason 1) is t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00284.html (8,091 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] DJ3IW and NAQP (long) (score: 1)
- Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:34:39 -0700
- HI HI, Goetz, I had made that comment completely jokingly :-) And, if they had bigger antennas, it would actually help them, since they have a better S/QRM ratio when receiving you... BUT ...only if
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00285.html (9,183 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] DJ3IW and NAQP (long) (score: 1)
- Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:58:44 -0400
- Goetz and all, Good question... and maybe provocative also... I can add another possible cause and question. I noticed this same effect in NAQP and also believe in reciprocity. As Ekki noted, I think
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00287.html (10,008 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] DJ3IW and NAQP (long) (score: 1)
- Author: llindblom@juno.com (llindblom@juno.com)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:25:44 GMT
- Yet another perspective related to wide filters. Due to rig problems I was forced to run the contest with a TS-930S using AFSK (LSB-wide filters) mode. On 20 and 40 the QRM with wide filter was wall
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00289.html (11,367 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu