- 1. [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:56:56 -0800
- I think I found a better way to explain the advantage of spaces in the exchange. Chen is correct in his analysis if you only send the exchange one time, such as 599-001. Here a space won't help. And
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00167.html (7,750 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:45:55 -0800
- Aha, I see you fell for that fallacy, Bill. If you are repeating an exchange only once, it is only good as what is known as an Error Detection code. I.e., it tells you something is wrong, it does not
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00169.html (8,517 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:57:29 -0800
- Oops sorry, I meant to say *two* or more repeats (i.e., a total of three serial numbers, or more). 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00170.html (6,963 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:04:28 -0800
- This weekend I've seen 599 001 001 599-001-001 599/001/001 500001 001 N1MM logger handled them all with nary a hiccup. Seems like much ado about nothing :-) 73 Tom W7WHY _____________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00172.html (7,576 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Ed <autek@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:40:24 -0500
- On 02/10/2013 05:04 PM, Tom Osborne wrote: This weekend I've seen 599 001 001 599-001-001 599/001/001 500001 001 N1MM logger handled them all with nary a hiccup. Seems like much ado about nothing :-)
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00174.html (7,727 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 16:19:28 -0800
- REPLY: Here's where we part company. If I see 599 QWE 123 I will not ask for a repeat. I will click on the 123 just as if the sender had sent only that. Is it perfect? No. Is it close enough? Yes. Bi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00180.html (8,041 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 16:55:55 -0800
- There you go changing the rules again, Bill. I thought you have very clearly stated the premise that you send a repeated number so they other end knows for sure s/he has received the right number. If
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00185.html (8,121 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:08:28 -0800
- At least I am willing to admit that "599-123-1WE" requires a repeat. Not me. In fact, I would accept "599-123-#@$..." as 123. Copy has a very good chance of being correct through the second dash. Sur
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00188.html (8,361 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 18:16:07 -0800
- REPLY: Good question, Here's a good answer: I don't send the exchange twice for my benefit. I send it for the other guy's. I want his log to be as accurate as mine. There are folks who disagree and s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00194.html (9,023 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Dash vs space, one last time (score: 1)
- Author: David Tanks <ad4tj@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:15:50 -0800 (PST)
- I guess I am a neophyte RTTY op, as if I don't see 599 123 I have to ask for a repeat. Sorry guys! 73, David AD4TJ ________________________________ From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> To: RTTY Reflector <
- /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00221.html (10,854 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu