- 1. [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Barr <vzevhlnw@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:40:33 -0500
- Talk about long? Here a short one. Several times I noticed a complete exchange like this: WA. No calls, no rst, no repeat, no string of periods and probably no line feed. For anonymity, it wasn't WA,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00073.html (6,891 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:00:08 -0600
- RST is silly, given that everyone sends 599, but it *is* part of the exchange. Good that there are no referees. :-) OK a few insist that 5NN is shorter. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Trav
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00087.html (7,342 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:06:19 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Actually, 5NN takes slightly longer because of the extra LTRS shift. It's no big deal, just a carryover from CW. 73, Bill W6WRT ______________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00097.html (7,447 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Exchange Length (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:39:06 -0600
- I know ... makes it plain that the folks that use it aren't really up on what they are doing. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! ______________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00103.html (7,373 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu