Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fan\s+dipole\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fan\s+dipole\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Fan dipole question (score: 1): Author: "Lee Ratcliff" <lratcliff@isp.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:13:43 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time); I have been measuring, and I have about 200 feet for the dipole. The 160m element for it will be about 250 feet. I was thinking about letting about 25 feet of the 160m section dangle, and coiled up i; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00293.html (7,616 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Fan dipole question (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:46:11 -0600; That will work fine and not have any perceptable impact on 160m performance. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN -- Message: 6 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:13:43 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) From: "Lee Ratcliff" <l; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00297.html (7,446 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Fan dipole question (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:41:36 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Letting it dangle in a straight line is ok, but coiling it up is not. You will be in effect adding an inductor at the point where you start the coiling and that; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00302.html (7,390 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]