Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\,\s+the\s+1st\s+part\.\.\.\s+sooner\s+than\s+you\s+think\!\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think! (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:48:04 -0400
-- Original Message -- From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET> To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>; <N1MMLogger@yahoogroups.com>; "Rlx" <RLX@yahoogroups.com>; "Nobarc" <nobarc@nobarc.org> S
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00077.html (13,272 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think! (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 07:01:29 -0700
No one says you HAVE to use FSK to do good. For those new to RTTY, FSK is preferred if your rig supports it, which most do. AFSK can be made to work just fine, but it requires paying strict attention
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00079.html (8,259 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think! (score: 1)
Author: Gedking@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:34:01 EDT
When the signal hits the antenna it don't know which it is. BUT remember RTTY is KEY DOWN so don't get long winded and cook ur finals. ED K8OT **It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find yo
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00080.html (6,910 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think! (score: 1)
Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:13:12 -0400
Let's get ready for CQ WW DX RTTY 2008. I am using FSK when at home or abroad and AFSK when operating from K1TTT. I am happy with both. They are both good. Lets get ready for CQ WW DX RTTY 2008 - no
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00081.html (9,434 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think! (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:35:25 -0700
That is true when AFSK is done properly. Done improperly, you can tell the difference easily. I usually hear one or two improper ones during every major contest. If you want to do AFSK, it would be w
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00090.html (7,773 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] CQWW, the 1st part... sooner than you think! (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:23:37 -0700
The same can be said about poorly generated FSK. When not waveshaped, an FSK (with instantaneous rise and fall times) is very wide. It is only about 20 dB down from the carrier at 220 Hz away from th
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-08/msg00091.html (9,492 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu