Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GU0SUP\s+BARTG\s+Sprint\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GU0SUP\s+BARTG\s+Sprint\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: pcooper at guernsey.net (Phil Cooper); Date: Sun Jan 26 08:28:29 2003; Hi all, Well, that was hard work! Having said that, I did get all 6 continents after about 4 - 5 hours of operating, so I can't complain. I did notice a lot of the RTTY regulars playing in the CQ 160; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00375.html (7,077 bytes)
2. [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:38:35 -0800; Hi all, Well, that was different! Starting a contest with a new PC, running Win7 for only 2 weeks, AND using the Microham MKII for the first time in a contest was all very different! Since getting th; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00254.html (10,792 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:47:19 -0500; I have seen other guys send slow, and wondered what was causing it. All Microhams do this? Anybody know why? Jerry W4UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00255.html (6,743 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:55:27 -0500; I have a Microham USB microkeyer, and at least when I monitor my transmission, it seems the right speed.... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00256.html (7,905 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: "wa5zup" <wa5zup@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700; The MicroHam is a little slower, just slightly. It is because it loads into a buffer and then is sent. At least that is my feeble understanding. The only time this would make any difference would be; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00259.html (8,460 bytes)
6. [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Doug Ferguson" <thenewt@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:13:45 -0800; I have definitely noticed the speed difference when strict bps is checked in the router for my MK2R+ but when I uncheck it, slight hesitations in the timing are noticeable but have never had any comm; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00263.html (7,087 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:41:23 -0500; Decoding is timing dependent. When TX is 50 baud, a RX modem expecting 45 baud can't decode it. Jerry W4UK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00264.html (7,777 bytes)
8. [RTTY] GU0SUP BARTG Sprint (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:17:49 -0800; Hi all, Well, it seems we have all (me included!) been a bit remiss in posting thoughts, comments, etc about RTTY contests after the event. I had very limited time to play in this one, as I had been; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00022.html (8,898 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]