- 1. [RTTY] GU0SUP CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:32:54 +0100
- Hi all, A pity the solar figures were so poor, as that definitely had a large effect. 15 and 10m were both hard work, and the lack of States on 15m certainly made a difference to my score. The first
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00000.html (7,784 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP CQWW (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:19:42 -0700
- Snip I was a bit surprised as well because we didn't work many Europeans on 10. 10 meters was open both days for us, but not much activity. Given limited or non-existent east-west propagation on 10
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00074.html (7,322 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu