Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GU0SUP\s+in\s+WPX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+GU0SUP\s+in\s+WPX\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:07:50 -0000; Hi all, First the claimed score! (I say claimed, as I am sure there is one bad QSO in there!) Class: SOAB LP QTH: Guernsey Operating Time (hrs): 15 Summary: Band QSOs Pts -- 80: 53 218 40: 48 200 20:; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00176.html (9,635 bytes)
2. [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:23:45 -0800; Hi all, Well, wasn't it nice to see the bands open! No 10m activity here at all, but 15m was buzzing well, and this is the first time in a few years that I have worked JA's on 15m. At the start of th; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00119.html (10,027 bytes)
3. [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:37:15 -0800; Hello all, It just goes to show what can happen to plans made for the contest! My goal was 1k QSO's for 1m+ points. I had a great session last year, and thought I could easily hit the 1k QSO mark thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00154.html (11,239 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:37:27 -0800; That's really disconcerting, since I am always happy to see you in my log. There was a G0SUP in the contest who called me - I made him repeat the call to be sure. I'm hoping that had something more t; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00159.html (7,514 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:38:32 -0500; hold on a secomd here... you mean to say that I got fooled by someone else using your call? I'm not at the station now and cannot check the log by I know for a fact that I did get called by gu0sup on; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00177.html (14,345 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:48:49 -0500; Good thing you called me by name Phil , that always works ! ( qso on 15 rtty ) Glenn VA3DX _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00202.html (8,374 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: iw1ayd <iw1ayd@googlemail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:13:51 +0100; I agree with the comments of Phil GU0SUP, point by point. TU Phil, as usual. One more point to be add should be that I have seen stations calling in WITH NUMBERS in the first time! Well, I could not; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00204.html (7,913 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:24:12 -0800; There would never be a G0SUP in the contest unless Phil operated from England. That's the way the callsigns work here. G4SKA moved to Wales in 1994 and became GW4SKA. If I moved to the Isle of Man it; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00206.html (9,934 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:42:59 +0000; 25 miles, straight across the water... Try Orkney - that's always quiet ;-) -- 73 from Ian GM3SEK http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00207.html (7,721 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:46:11 -0800; The occasional station that responds to my CQ with numbers doesn't bother me. I just click on his call, click on his NR, hit my Exchange and TU keys and keep going. If nothing else they keep me awake; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00248.html (8,462 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] GU0SUP in WPX (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:43:15 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Agreed. The guy who sends the exchange first is only mildly annoying, provided he does everything else right. What often happnes is he send his exhcange, I reply with my exhc; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00253.html (8,155 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]