- 1. [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:18:43 +0000
- Please read the note I had from Chip W7AIT, below, and my reply above. Sensible comments will be welcome; we have enough wars already. Chip, Thanks for the mail about our contest. I will reply in ful
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00722.html (7,731 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:33:04 -0600
- Well John, you were about as nice as you could possibly be in your reply comments. However his attitude and comments really didn't deserve your time and patience. A gentleman you are. I'd like to bel
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00725.html (8,646 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:18:51 -0600
- Before anyone is tempted to answer this individual, even politely, read this in the archives http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/rtty/2005-September/015704.html John may have already gotten a "poli
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00728.html (11,390 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:38:51 -0500
- Ron Kolarik wrote: "Before anyone is tempted to answer this individual, even politely, read this in the archives http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/rtty/2005-September/015704.html" The inability o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00729.html (7,280 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:30:53 -0500
- John, This guy is a constant troublemaker regarding RTTY contesting. He has an Advanced license so he could easily upgrade to Extra (now that the US code requirements are essentially gone) and by doi
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00732.html (7,885 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:45:42 -0600
- See : http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/rtty/2005-September/015701.html _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00733.html (7,188 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Stewart <rstewart@paradise.net.nz>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:09:04 +0000
- Hi John, Sorry I missed you in the BARTG Sprint - heard and called you on 20m but you did not hear me. My comments - The Region III digital bands go down to 7030 and for JA 7025 so the comments about
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00734.html (9,971 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:31:15 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I wonder what he's using for a receiver that has so much trouble handling RTTY. Maybe he should upgrade to a tuned-input crystal se
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00001.html (6,759 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: John Barber <SKA@bartg.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:20:04 +0000
- Thanks to all who responded. I hadn't made the link between Chip W7AIT and the previous mails to Sigi and others. Subject closed here with no need to respond further or waste any more time. Thanks ag
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00003.html (6,747 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Interfere with CW (score: 1)
- Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 8:26:18 -0500
- I looked at some of this guy correspondence online and in one place he describe his RTTY setup so I don't think he hates RTTY and I really don't think he just hate contesters. I think the word we're
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00014.html (8,009 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu