Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Ionospheric\s+Physics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Ionospheric\s+Physics\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:31:02 -0800; The ionosphere is amazing. It knows what you are doing even better than NSA does. CQ RU W6SX CQ AA5AU AA5AU AA5AU 599 CA 599 LA LA TU W6SX CQ or CQ RU W6SX CQ W6SX W6SX DE w3#$% @3x*& PSE KN AGN W6SX; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00045.html (7,186 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: "Shoppa, Tim" <tshoppa@wmata.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:51:34 +0000; Oh you forgot the exchanges like RYRYRYRYRY [CR][LF] [CR][LF] [CR][LF] ,,,,,,...... N3QE GOOD MORNING ,,,,,...... [CR][LF] ,,,,..... HELLO TIMOTHY YOU ARE 5NN @3x*& ,,,,,,,..... Where they just send; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00052.html (7,720 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:44:02 -0600; I was actually pleased at how little of that there seemed to be this year. Made the few that use ornate macros stick out all the more. Saw several ops repeat the so-called RST, too. No idea what that; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00067.html (7,717 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:35:51 -0600; There's still very few that just send "599 LA LA " or whatever their state or s/n is. That's all that is needed "most of the time". In cases where you have ALREADY worked a station previously in the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00073.html (9,664 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: John Merrill <jlmerrill@webmail.wit.edu>; Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:43:28 -0700; There are usually a couple that don't send enough- no RST. I usually ask them to send their RST and they seem confused. When they finally figure it out, they send it multiple times. Must have ticked; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00074.html (10,492 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@twc.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 04:19:11 -0500; AA5AU wrote: "The problem is that you would have to look at each contact to see if you worked the station previously in the contest, then use a different macro to send the S&P exchange. I realize it'; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00102.html (9,343 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Ionospheric Physics (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 18:19:32 -0500; Shelby, I support what you say completely. This subject of delayed response has come up before and I have seen all the arguments from multi-radio stations. I don't have a problem with SO2R/SO3R opera; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-01/msg00197.html (12,011 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]