I have simple requirements but I can't find a vendor that can meet them all. o single USB cable from PC to box o built-in sound device o single cable to radio (multiple heads for connections not on a
"Slow RTTY" is *not* related to 45 vs. 45.45 baud. The 0.9% difference between 45.45 and 45 baud (22.22 ms vs. 22 ms) or less than 0.1 second for a "typical" 50 character contest exchange is not det
Peter, MicroHam interfaces are not responsible for "slow RTTY". I use the microKEYER, and it sends normal FSK RTTY. The microKEYER II shouldmeet all of your requirements. 73, Jim N6VH o single USB ca
I'm pretty happy with the 3 Microkeyer devices I have, and NONE send "slow" rtty...... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
I had earlier written to Peter that although the MicroHam interfaces cannot achieve precise 45.45 baud transmission, that the hardware cannot be the cause of any of the "slow RTTY" that we hear -- si
That's not quite right, Chen. Slow RTTY has been around for quite a while. Comes from improperly set up software programs most of which were around a lot longer than K3's and there weird paddle. Not
The CW paddle sent RTTY from an Elecraft K3 is one possible source of "slow RTTY". Another, as has been eluded to, is the settings within some software. I am going to describe two tests you can run f
Could the recent spate in Slow RTTY be caused by the open sourcing of MMTTY, and people unknowingly modifying the code and thus inserting latencies to the characters? There are three kinds of "slow R
I don't recall hearing any "slow" RTTY signals at all this weekend. Maybe it's not as widespread as some think. 73, Don AA5AU a hand key, just through a pa ___________________________________________
K5DU was a sound (oh, what a sound it was...) example. 73, Vlad VE3IAE -- I don't recall hearing any "slow" RTTY signals at all this weekend. Maybe it's not as widespread as some think. 73, Don AA5AU
I heared 4 or 5 times such a kind of signals from Europe last WW. But I remember in past when it was fast flatters on NA signals which was came over North Pole the slow RTTY reads better than normal
I heard very few. - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff@gmail.com Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/ Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak ________________________________________
This condition can be created easily with MMTTY and direct keyboard entry. Simply increase the "Diddle wait" slider on the TX Tab in MMTTY Set-up (or at the right side of the transmit menu of the ma
Yes, Susan's RTTY signal has always been "distinctive" to my ears because of the slower pacing of the characters. But that is the only one I can recall specifically as an example. 73 de Bob - KØRC in
Agreed Don! But then again, I only did a 80 meter single band gig. Thanks for the contact! I hope you did well. It was a great contest. 73 Jim W7RY 73, Don AA5AU ________________________________ From
I only remember a few - and those stand out just because they are rare. I just figured were guys hunt-and-peck or using the K3/paddle thing. Definitely this issue is not related to the physical inter
Chen, Your explanation of 'slow-RTTY' is clear and welcome as a source. In the 'good-ole-days' such instances were rare (unless something was broken). Personally I believe that more detail was spent
Talk to Chen and he'll explain it to you. :-) Not true. You can take open source code and, depending on the license, redistribute a modifed-yet-crappy version, but those are caught quickly (and, in m
True there is at least one company that licensed it others that pretty much didn't. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
Jay, Long time, no QSO. Hope you are well. You're right, most PACTOR-1 was reverse engineered and not licensed. Meanwhile, RTTY is flexible, yet I believe AMTOR was more robust. I wonder if there eve