Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MINUTES\s+OF\s+ARRL\s+EXECUTIVE\s+COMMITTEE\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MINUTES\s+OF\s+ARRL\s+EXECUTIVE\s+COMMITTEE\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:31:19 -0500; The EC minute details are listed below and RM-11708 is discussed in section 4.2.4 Terry AB5K 4.2.4. Comments on the ARRL?s petition, RM-11708, continue to be received by the FCC past the deadline, mo; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00092.html (20,995 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:38:38 -0500; So either you 1) support the ARRL (and are are one smart cookie!) - or 2) you are uninformed, misunderstanding the clear and obvious benefits of the ARRL position. Sounds just like the kind of nonsen; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00093.html (21,783 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:23:41 -0400; 4.2.4. Comments on the ARRLs petition, RM-11708, continue to be received by the FCC past the deadline, most of them brief comments of support but with some opposing comments that reflect a misunderst; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00094.html (8,842 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]