Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MMVARI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MMVARI\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] MMVARI (score: 1): Author: VE2FWW <ve2fww@globetrotter.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:15:17 +0000; Anybody tried MMVARI as a RTTY ecoder and compared to MMTTY??? That's what I am doing now.....very hard to tell what's the best.. Wonder if anybody had used MMVARI in a contest ???? Thanks NOEL ve2ry; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00096.html (6,117 bytes)
2. [RTTY] MMVARI (score: 1): Author: "Tom Martin" <tmartin@chartermi.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:28:38 -0500; I use MMVARI for everyday operation in Logger32. I find that it is a better decoder for me. In contests, single radio, I use MMVARI with N1MM. If I use SO2R, I use MMTY because I use FSK on the secon; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00099.html (7,207 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] MMVARI (score: 1): Author: VE2FWW <ve2fww@globetrotter.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:35:25 +0000; Thanks Tom. I am just testing it with MMTTY..Sounds great decoder... At the moment, I do not see much difference between the two softwares. But I am keeping on testing them.. Regards and thanks again; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00100.html (8,053 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] MMVARI (score: 1): Author: "WS7I" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:36:36 -0700; Does it replace MMTTY in Writelog ? -- ws7i@ewarg.org _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00101.html (8,062 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] MMVARI (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:59:58 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:15:17 +0000, VE2FWW <ve2fww@globetrotter.net> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Using two separate computers, I compared the two when MMVARI first came out and found; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00103.html (7,454 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] MMVARI (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 18:21:58 +0100; Hi Noel and the group, I too have a copy of MMVARI, but that main obstacle is that it is only AFSK. I have used it to monitor RTTY stations, and my experience is that it copies just as well as MMTTY.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00109.html (8,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]