- 1. [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:20:31 -0400
- Am I the only one that found a lot of poor macros during the JARTS. Not sure from where it came from... but for the first time lot of guys were sending twice-twice the RST. Also, more than 50% were s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00386.html (7,241 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Sauvey <akdxer@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
- Claude, The only issue I had was those stations that did not put a space between the signal report and their age (59943, etc). Macros are like radios, everybody has something different. With my inter
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00387.html (8,164 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:13:26 -0400
- I am not a macro PRO, but I have a suggestion: The exchange number, state, age, etc is the "payload". It and the callsign are the most important items being sent and it should be sent at least 3 time
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00396.html (8,166 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:47:26 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I'll take the bait. Macros are one of my favorite things to play with. I've been tweaking contest macros for over ten years. Here are my recommendations, with an
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00399.html (10,756 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:50:47 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I disagree. A space is VITAL after the macro but not before it. An "enter" is much better at the start because it starts a new line. 73, Bill W6WRT _____________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00400.html (7,261 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:01:37 +0100
- Hallo Claude and the group, I agree that there will be many flavours of any exchange in a contest as we all have different preferences and choices of software. That won't change. Some do not like the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00401.html (9,604 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:24:04 -0400
- Thanks guys for your comments. If we could only broadcast that so that all RTTY opr. got it. By the way I was wondering if some software still need the DE to highlight the callsign or move it to the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00414.html (8,024 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:45:39 -0700
- Bill is right on. But, put the {enter} BEFORE the macro and NONE at the end of the macro. Just 2 or 3 spaces. I have seen some op's put 3 or 4 LF's at the end and their call goes right up out of sigh
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00415.html (8,184 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:44:09 -0400
- And if you see TU CLAUDE PSE RPT? RPT? or just TU RPT? Would you be gone before the request for an exchange repeat? I like QSL first. You know your in-the-log. _______________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00418.html (8,377 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:57:18 -0400
- VE2FK wrote: "If we could only broadcast that so that all RTTY opr. got it." Why is it that we "go through this after most every RTTY contest"? Most every post, to this reflector, on any subject rega
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00424.html (8,662 bytes)
- 11. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:30:48 -0400
- Art, for me TU say it all, (QSL, TU, 73) So, you dont start with QSL if you need a RPT... maybe I am wrong. Shelby/K4WW suggestion to send email with info after the contest is a good point. Of course
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00428.html (9,463 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:19:41 -0500
- Being a new contester and an even newer RTTY contester, I would greatly appreciate an email outlining how I could improve any of my contest skills such as how to structure my macros. Having to work o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00429.html (8,655 bytes)
- 13. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: "Gordon LaPoint" <n1mgo@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:48:19 -0400
- Clint, Having done many RTTY contests over the years, I have found the best advice so far is at Don's (AA5AU) site. http://www.rttycontesting.com/ and: http://www.aa5au.com/rtty.html His contesting s
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00432.html (9,492 bytes)
- 14. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:04:06 -0500
- Right and that's why I always liked the WF1B scroll. the current line was always grabbable (is grabbable a word?) -- Original Message -- From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> To: "RTTY" <rtty@conte
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00465.html (9,792 bytes)
- 15. Re: [RTTY] Macros in the JARTS (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:58:38 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:04:06 -0500, "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com> wrote: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- The problem with WF1B's scroll and WriteLog's non-scroll is you must constantly repos
- /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00476.html (8,970 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu