Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Mark\s+Frequency\s+Display\s+Conversion\s+on\s+Kenwood\s+rigs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Mark\s+Frequency\s+Display\s+Conversion\s+on\s+Kenwood\s+rigs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Mark Frequency Display Conversion on Kenwood rigs (score: 1): Author: "Dick Kriss, AA5VU" <aa5vu@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:21:39 -0500; I was working a station on 20 meter RTTY today and he was using a Kenwood TS-480HX (200 watt version) but he was only using 75 watts. He was using MIXW 2.12 software and a RASCAL interface. He had a; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00146.html (7,210 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Mark Frequency Display Conversion on Kenwood rigs (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@chinet.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:43:50 -0500 (CDT); Yeah, this happened to me in the spring. The IC725 is a FB rig, but after a few contests (350 Qs in WPX!), I decided I wanted filters. Since there's no FSK mode on the 725, that meant a kludge ... on; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00149.html (7,286 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Mark Frequency Display Conversion on Kenwood rigs (score: 1): Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:25:36 -0500; a I guess I disagree, Dick. I guess if you re just trying to work a DX you've found in the middle of the RTTY subband, maybe that outlook's OK. However, what if you tell a DX to QSY to work him on a; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00150.html (8,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]