Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+My\s+thoughts\s+on\s+RTTY\s+analysis\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+My\s+thoughts\s+on\s+RTTY\s+analysis\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:37:50 -0400; I've been following the thread and now I'm tempted to step gingerly into the lion's den. From a practical point of view, yes the RTTY analysis is interesting. However, I've got a point of view. First; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00171.html (9,859 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:52:28 -0700; REPLY: Obsessions found all over the ham spectrum. There are a couple of subscribers to the Amps reflector who are obsessed with IMD performance. Meeting the FCC specs is not nearly good enough, they; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00172.html (9,072 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1): Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:03:14 -0600; I agree. I guess that's why I don't have a $3000+ rig or a StepIR or a 100+ foot tower. But, if there's money in it for the top score, I'll consider spending the bucks. But, I sure would like to at l; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00176.html (6,829 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:00:50 -0500; The bandwidth thing gets a bad name. It's really not in anyone's best interest to have a wide signal, including your own. One reason for that is the fat signal is harder to tune. That means guys trac; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00182.html (11,548 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:18:01 -0700; REPLY: There is a tradeoff here. The laws of physics have something to say about a "crispy clean" signal. RTTY is a form of FM. Think of a carrier modulated by a square wave. If you recall your FM th; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00183.html (8,284 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] My thoughts on RTTY analysis (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:58:53 -0500; Bill, Yea, I understand the sidebands due to the modulation. Plenty of fat signals out there to go with the skinny ones of equal amplitude though. A bandscope shows the good, bad and ugly in living c; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00184.html (9,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]