Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+My\s+thoughts\s+on\s+the\s+UBN\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+My\s+thoughts\s+on\s+the\s+UBN\'s\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net (Phil Cooper); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 22:37:33 +0100; Hi guys, Well, I can see that this subject is going to get a hammering! FWIW, this years' logs are over and done with, and there is little we can do about that this year. I agree with the consensus t; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00116.html (8,719 bytes)
2. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: alanc@indyweb.net (Alan Curson); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 17:31:36 -0500; do is who If everybody gets disqualified, what's the big deal? Alan. WD9GMK; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00117.html (8,094 bytes)
3. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 20:11:04 -0400; Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net> wrote: "Anyone have any sway with the powers-that-be at CQ??" Not me. But it sure would make for an "interesting" discussion at Dayton? Not too sure it could be ac; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00119.html (8,093 bytes)
4. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: George Johnson" <w1zt@arrl.net (George Johnson); Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:09:27 -0400; All, This sounds like an excellent topic for Dayton. And since I missed the contest entirely last year, my "UBN" has no deductions at all... :-)) But Eddie had mentioned a similar issue last year and; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00121.html (10,269 bytes)
5. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: k3mm@comcast.net (k3mm@comcast.net); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 01:25:32 -0400; Common misconception: CQ is running the contests. Truth: CQ has NOTHING TO DO with running ANY of their contests. CQ Contests are all run by volunteers and sometimes you get a lot more than what you; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00127.html (8,011 bytes)
6. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: eu1sa@belsonet.net (Vladimir V. Sidorov); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:57:22 +0300; Hello George et all, It does not look like there should be numerous recommendations or suggestions. Just one thing should be set up: the log checking program should not ASSUME anything. In this parti; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00131.html (8,807 bytes)
7. [RTTY] My thoughts on the UBN's (score: 1): Author: gw4khquk@yahoo.co.uk (john woodland); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:51:45 +0100 (BST); I can only agree with Walt, what are we going to do next year if this is not resolved. Are we going to amend logs to give the correct zone as the checking software sees it or leave as logged. Besides; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00136.html (10,163 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]