Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+NAQP\s*$/: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Homewood" <w1to@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:19:28 -0400
I will be operating from K1TTT's super station as W8BAR, Tom MA. I plan a 10 hour effort. YCCC has a 5 man team entered, but not all will be full time participants. Based on the West Coast request I
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00058.html (6,700 bytes)

42. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Wayne King" <wfking@att.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:14:17 -0400
I will be playing in the NAQP. Anyone need a team member? Wayne N2WK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00067.html (6,545 bytes)

43. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:06:10 -0500
NAQP JUL 2006 CALL: WX4TM NAME: TOM QTH: AL CLASS: SOABLP OP TIME: 5.5 HRS SUMMARY: 80M 80 33 40M 134 39 20M 132 39 15M 0 0 10M 0 0 TOTAL 346 111 SCORE: 38,406 SOAPBOX Mercy sakes alive! Is the moon
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00098.html (8,324 bytes)

44. Re: [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Bromley" <jayw5jay@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:16:19 -0500
Hi Tom, It happens, but you struggled through it. Good for you! The one comment I wanted to follow up on is I think "Overflow" on MMTTY is too much audio level from your rig, like if you are using a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00099.html (8,761 bytes)

45. [RTTY] naqp (score: 1)
Author: John Orton <wa6bob@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:17:37 +0000
North American QSO Party, RTTY Call: WA6BOB Operator(s): WA6BOB Station: WA6BOB Class: Single Op LP QTH: CA Operating Time (hrs): 1:00 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 0 0 40: 0 0 20: 14 11 15: 25 14
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00409.html (6,205 bytes)

46. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:22:25 -0500
just played S&P. A real struggle, for some reason, super strong stations couldn't hear me on 20. Maybe it was prop, maybe my beam was too much and higher angle antennas would have been better. 40 was
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-07/msg00136.html (7,197 bytes)

47. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: John Orton <wa6bob@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:23:49 +0000
North American QSO Party, RTTY Call: WA6BOB Operator(s): WA6BOB Station: WA6BOB Class: Single Op LP QTH: CA Operating Time (hrs): 5:30 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 80: 40 16 40: 93 35 20: 122 43 15: 0
/archives//html/RTTY/2007-07/msg00139.html (6,746 bytes)

48. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: jdd <jdd@odsgc.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:27:26 -0600
NAQP RTTY 2008 STATION: AC0E OP: JIM AC0E & XYL PENNY KD0CYE QSOs: 101 MULTI: 59 SCORE: 5,959 OP TIME 5hr 52min BAND QSO MULTI 20 33 18 40 24 16 _80 44 25 _ 101 59 *SOAPBOX: *GET YOUR YL OR XYL TO OP
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00339.html (6,384 bytes)

49. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Phil Snyder <n9lah@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:07:20 -0500
Had a great time with this one. Op'd all ten available hours. It is the first time in quite awhile that I was able to make Q's on all 5 bands but with new mults every time you switch bands it is pret
/archives//html/RTTY/2008-07/msg00101.html (7,477 bytes)

50. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:01:20 -0500
Band QSOs Pts Sec NA 7 62 62 30 0 14 85 85 34 1 21 23 23 9 0 Total 170 170 73 1 Score: 12,580 I had some fun. There were many calls on the bands and propagation was fairly good. I note that when I se
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-07/msg00095.html (6,901 bytes)

51. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 20:53:40 -0500
I made 175 Q's in the NAQP in my 3.5 hours I worked the contest. 17 on 80, 22 on 40 and 136 on 20 meters with 60 mults. N1MM worked great. 44 were 1st time calls. Maybe we are getting some new blood
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-07/msg00174.html (7,052 bytes)

52. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:46:45 -0700
If I understand the rules correctly, single ops can't use DX clusters (telnet stuff)? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00416.html (6,042 bytes)

53. Re: [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:59:26 -0600
That is correct. No spotting assistance is allowed. 73, Don AA5AU If I understand the rules correctly, single ops can't use DX clusters (telnet stuff)? _______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00417.html (6,811 bytes)

54. [RTTY] NAQP (score: 1)
Author: "Richard White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 19:40:49 -0500
I was able to work the NAQP for 3 hours. I made 110 Q's during that time. But, N1MM+ only scored 108 contacts. I have looked at my log and there are no DUPEs and all calls are for NA. I did work ZF1A
/archives//html/RTTY/2017-07/msg00054.html (6,590 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu