Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+New\s+call\s+with\s+no\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+New\s+call\s+with\s+no\s+numbers\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 03:53:55 -0800; According to Bernie, W3UR, the Laotian government has issued a ham call without any numbers in it - XWPA. Supposedly it is good for all ham bands and modes for one year. He'll be running 250 watts. B; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00000.html (6,207 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:38:53 -0500; Funny. Those 4 letters callsign are normally for ships. 73, Claude VE2FK ex: CGSM According to Bernie, W3UR, the Laotian government has issued a ham call without any numbers in it - XWPA. Supposedly; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00001.html (7,312 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:47:54 -0800; And, except for the Mekong, Laos is landlocked :-). Not the first ham call with no numbers, but Bernie appears to have achieved the status of RAEM :-). 73 Chen, W7AY _________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00003.html (7,153 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:05:23 -0500; Anyone remember 5UV386 from 1988 ???? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00004.html (8,204 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:19:50 -0800; Are you sure there is no missing LTRS shift in there somewhere? :-) (Duck!) I don't remember that call, but I did work XUF2B in an RTTY contest many moons ago. At first I thought the "F2B" has some s; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00005.html (8,157 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:36:59 -0800; Wasn't that an old rectifier tube?? Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00006.html (8,730 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:53:49 -0500; It was Baldur DJ6SI from the NIGER .... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00007.html (8,428 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:02:14 -0800; You thinking of the 5U4GT? :-) :-) 5Z4GT, also a rectifier type, is a real call sign. I don't know about 5U4GT. Can Canadians pick CK722 as a call sign? :-P 73 Chen, W7AY ____________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00008.html (8,213 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 17:07:33 -0500; ... or TYA11 from 1981 (don't know if that was ever on RTTY)? 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00009.html (8,766 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:12:11 -0700; One doesn't even have to go back a week. BN100 ("BN-one-hundred") was active in the CQWW CW contest this past weekend. 73 - Jim AD1C; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00010.html (8,388 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Steve AI9T <steve@ai9t.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:03:10 -0500; I would my call with cut numbers AI9T = AINT -- 73 Steve AI9T http://www.ai9t.com QSL via LOTW and EQsL On 12/1/2010 6:12 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: _______________________________________________ R; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00011.html (9,048 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Steve AI9T <steve@ai9t.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:20:08 -0500; I would "LIKE" my call with cut numbers AI9T = AINT -- 73 Steve AI9T http://www.ai9t.com QSL via LOTW and EQsL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00012.html (8,530 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 21:10:49 -0500 (EST); RAEM was a famous Russian ham call back in the 60s USSR. It was from an Arctic explorer ship, the S/S Cheluskin. The ship was smashed in the ice in 1934 and Ernst Krenkel, the radio operator, became; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00013.html (8,444 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:45:41 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Or the infamous P5RS7 from North Korea? Romeo Stepanenko? I have a beautiful QSL card, utterly worthless. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ R; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00014.html (8,549 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 04:55:12 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: You're really mining the archives now, Chen. I wonder how many hams recognize the signiifiance of CK722? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY m; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00018.html (8,963 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:12:06 -0500 (EST); ?? I'm one of those in the dark about CK722. Enlighten me. Thanks, Kermit, AB1J In a message dated 12/3/2010 12:55:33 P.M. GMT Standard Time, dezrat1242@yahoo.com writes: REPLY: You're really mining; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00019.html (8,377 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Doug Hall <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:38:17 -0500; The CK722 was one of the first commercially available transistors. Germanium, I believe. I have a 1957 QST with a construction article for a receiver using CK722 transistors. The author mentions that; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00020.html (9,114 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 07:19:03 -0800; One of the first germanium PNP junction transistors that hams used. http://www.ck722museum.com/ It was followed in later years by the equally ubiquitous 2N107. Across the pond, the popular transistor; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00021.html (8,556 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:11:06 -0800; Hey! I still have a couple in one of my parts drawers from a project in my younger days! 73 Jim W7RY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00029.html (10,555 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] New call with no numbers (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 11:16:46 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I see there are a few for sale on eBay at some remarkable prices. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00030.html (9,726 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]