Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+North\s+American\s+QSO\s+Party\,\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+North\s+American\s+QSO\s+Party\,\s+RTTY\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:26:31 -0700; There had been some talk in the past about allowing the use of amplifiers in the NAQP RTTY test since lots of radios can't run 100 watts key down for long periods of time. I know my TS-450's won't ru; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00016.html (7,860 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:40:05 +0000; Tom, they went through all of this last year on the rtty reflector--some one contacted the powers to be and they said that "would check in to it"-- heard nothing since...until after the test and the; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00018.html (8,599 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:13:22 -0700; In an era where 10W radios using external amps to get to 100W is much more common than even a few years ago, I think removing the rule makes sense. I suggest a petition of some sort, a polite letter; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00020.html (10,065 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:17:50 -0700; NAQP RTTY manager K6UFO reads this reflector and I'm confident will make a sound decision on the issue. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://l; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00021.html (10,620 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: Courtney Judd <k4wi@k4wi.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:20:26 -0500; hey Jeff and all, I really don't see the problem with 100 watt rigs running 100 watts rtty....IF they put external fans on the rig. I use external fans on everything, rig, amps, monitors, and use ove; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00026.html (8,675 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:45:11 -0700; hi Cort - True. I used to do the same with a K2 and could pound through a contest at 100W (even though it wasn't technically rated for it.) The issue is for those ops that have 10W rigs with an exter; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00027.html (9,180 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: K6UFO Mark Aaker <k6ufo@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:41:07 +0000 (UTC); Hi Tom, I'm sorry for my delayed response to this thread but I was traveling today. The last time you raised this topic with me, Dec 28, 2011 in my records, I did send you a "rationale." You thanked; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00028.html (10,425 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1): Author: steve <sm.shearer.01@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:14:01 -0400; I like the "no external amplifiers capable of more than 100 W output." rule. If I were running my 40 Watt (RTTY) rig, like a IC-706, and an external amp like my 30L-1 at 100 watts, I doubt I could be; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00029.html (9,134 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]