Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Not\s+to\s+beat\s+the\s+ADVANTAGE\s+OF\s+BIG\s+ANTENNAS\s+horse\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Not\s+to\s+beat\s+the\s+ADVANTAGE\s+OF\s+BIG\s+ANTENNAS\s+horse\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Not to beat the ADVANTAGE OF BIG ANTENNAS horse... (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:52:52 +0000; WHEREAS WHEN ALL ELSE IS EQUAL, the addition of a BIG TOWER AND BEAM is and has been proven to be a significant contesting advantage, often greater than the High Power advantage, as shown by resultan; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00162.html (9,105 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ADVANTAGE OF BIG ANTENNAS horse... (score: 1): Author: "Tom Moore" <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:41:12 -0500; I have known many examples of wire antennas outperforming big beam antennas in certain contests, locations, and propagation conditions. For instance, even in the NAQP, a good wire antenna with multip; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00169.html (13,107 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ADVANTAGE OF BIG ANTENNAS horse... (score: 1): Author: K2ZR <k2zr@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:44:17 -0400; Tom, Your comments on right on which is precisely why I don't spend much time in the CQWW, or other big DX contests: I have no chance to win which as you say is what competition is all about: To comp; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00174.html (14,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]