Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PSK\s+TURNOVER\s+SPEED\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PSK\s+TURNOVER\s+SPEED\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: "Jack West XP" <w7ld@theriver.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:46:25 -0800; Hi, < As a ragchew mode, that does use very little bandwidth, easily more robust < in copy then RTTY, and most use 50 watts or less. But.... the one thing I < think that will keep it from ever becomi; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00253.html (7,790 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: "Michael Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:11:29 -0500; Ok Jack, no I have never really done anything but a little PSK31 here and there. I have a friend in FL that I think has tried them all out. Since it's typing mode over the air, I tend to rush and get; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00254.html (7,673 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:30:15 -0800; Everyone has great things to say about the DX capabilities of PSK, but as long as it is regarded as a "low-power" mode I don't think it will catch on as a DX mode. The problem seems to be the accurse; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00255.html (7,546 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:39:18 -0500; Hi all, Interesting thread! Jack W7LD wrote: "................It is my opinion PSK has great promise as a contest mode if you run PSK-63 or PSK-125 mode. These two modes are really quick and with sup; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00258.html (9,439 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:36:08 -0800; To set the record straight -- if your rig has been adjusted properly, you don't swamp anyone. Unless you are exceeding their receiver's dynamic range, but that is not a mode-specific problem. In fact; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00262.html (10,238 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:54:08 -0800; I used to think that is a problem with PSK31, and like Phil, I used to wait for the next CQ. But I have solved this in cocoaModem back in 2005. The problem with PSK tuning is that you need to tuned t; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00265.html (11,338 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:55:59 -0800; Oops, I meant "NO other." 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00266.html (7,512 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] PSK TURNOVER SPEED... (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:42:00 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Apparently the PSK gang's dynamic range is easily exceeded, especially when using the waterfall. All I know is if you run legal limit power in the PSK "band" you; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00272.html (8,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]