Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PW0T\s+\-\s+disgusting\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PW0T\s+\-\s+disgusting\!\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:31:15 -0500; 0230z on the 21st. Some lid keeps sending EU EU EU EU on top of PW0T, despite the fact that he actually DOES occasionally work stations in EU. NE0DX called RIGHT ON TOP of PW0T after I gave him my re; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00335.html (7,808 bytes)
2. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:46:10 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Don't be so sure it really was NE0DX. A few days ago a jammer was using my call right on top of the DX. I'd call up a few kHz, and as soon as; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00336.html (8,150 bytes)
3. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: w4lc@juno.com (James E Brown); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:50:25 +0000; Same experience here! On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:31:15 -0500 "Jim Reisert" <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> writes: ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00337.html (8,937 bytes)
4. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:20:28 -0600; Bill, I've seen fakes also. I've had it happen to me in contests. But there where a few vfo mishaps. Far worse were the 'constant callers' who made the rate so unbearably slow... again.; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00339.html (9,310 bytes)
5. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: MIKEHAACK@aol.com (MIKEHAACK@aol.com); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:38:52 EST; --part1_185.3f38389.29a5c5cc_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry Jim, But I can hear the Violins warming up now... Who amongst Us hasn't gotten; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00340.html (8,134 bytes)
6. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:07:08 -0600; It's all part of the game Jim. After 325 current DXCC entities on RTTY, I've learned to deal with it the best one can. I built a station at my work this past weekend & Monday including installing a b; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00341.html (11,396 bytes)
7. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: faunt@panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:27:30 -0500 (EST); The one I saw was K8SIX this time. You're allowed one call but when you keep doing it for a number of minutes, long enough to bring out the "UP UP" police, who are worse, it's indicative of not payin; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00342.html (8,370 bytes)
8. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:43:22 -0600; I don't think it makes a difference. UP means UP and it's up to us to find out where the DX is listening. Don AA5AU; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00343.html (8,147 bytes)
9. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: deuxfox@earthlink.net (deuxfox); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 05:09:15 +0000; I feel having a specific range helps you develop a feel for the kind of operator you have on the DX end and what he is anticipating. I wish all would include the station they are answering at the sta; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00345.html (8,390 bytes)
10. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:45:35 -0800; Don, KF2XF, asked Maidenhead gridsquare. 20.5 degrees South, 29 degrees West. 73 Chen, AA6TY; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00347.html (7,866 bytes)
11. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: deuxfox@earthlink.net (deuxfox); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 07:11:04 +0000; Thanks guys, I've never gotten a gridsquare that didn't have an F or E at the start. Looked like garbage to me! Don, KF2XF; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00349.html (8,090 bytes)
12. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 06:55:45 -0500; Maybe they should better send "NOT HR NOT HR"; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00353.html (8,180 bytes)
13. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 06:19:00 -0600; It's a little long but I'm in favor of: "ONLY TALIBAN MEMBERS CALL ON THE DX FREQ"; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00354.html (8,952 bytes)
14. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:09:06 -0000; UP doesn't always mean UP. Sometimes it means "Gee I wonder if they mean me?" Funny story - A number of years ago, there was a rare one on 40 CW with a massive pileup (simplex). The DX said "2UP." Ev; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00355.html (8,938 bytes)
15. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: mobile.workshop@guernseytelecoms.com (Mobile Workshop); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:33:10 -0000; Hi Doug, and to the group, For me, I think it may be better to simply say UP, rather than UP 2 - 8, as the DX often listens more than 8 up anyway, It doesn't seem to matter how far UP you specify eit; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00358.html (10,155 bytes)
16. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:04:26 -0800; Unlike CW, where you can copy "UP" through another signal, two RTTY signals on top of one another (unless one is larger than the other one by the capture ratio of the modem) will result in garbage. T; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00360.html (8,625 bytes)
17. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:16:02 -0500; My comment above was in jest - I meant the -DX- station might send "CALLSIGN QRZ NOT HR"... ;-) I agree that certainly the cops have no role, and even the well-intentioned probably should refrain fro; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00361.html (9,088 bytes)
18. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: diverken@chaffee.net (Ken Eigsti); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:14:14 -0700; Hi TTyers, What happens when certain rttyers, who have no clue they are on simplex, continue to send their call about 8-10 times while you are trying to work the dx? This is not just one transmission; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00365.html (10,493 bytes)
19. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: ekki@plicht.de (Ekki Plicht); Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 03:42:17 +0100; Education, education, education... but not on the band during DX as cops do. By us, by me, by you, by all who made successful contacts on DX and have some experience, on either end of DX. Off of the; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00366.html (9,624 bytes)
20. [RTTY] PW0T - disgusting! (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:33:45 -0800; Great suggestion, Ekki. I will do that from now on. You can tell that many people are not at their radio today, but just watching the DX clusters. I often find DX begging for calls with no takers. Th; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00369.html (9,060 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]