Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Pactor\s+QRM\s+To\s+The\s+Other\s+Digital\s+Modes\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella W4HM" <thomasfgiella@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:25:41 -0400
I've been operating the digital modes since 2003 and RTTY contesting since 2006 and I've had 100's of QSO's destroyed by PACTOR stations that didn't listen before transmitting on top of my QSO. Liste
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00081.html (7,159 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:07:39 -0400
I agree with most of what Thomas says; however, as a Pactor operator myself and a long time user I do disagree with one aspect. Pactor operators as a whole are not rude nor selfish. Instead it's the
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00084.html (9,148 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <jim@rhodesend.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 13:15:10 -0600
Phil, that defines rude and selfish for me. myself and owners of not (or pursuits intercourse is experience of since 2006 and I've had 100's of QSO's destroyed by PACTOR stations that didn't listen b
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00086.html (9,583 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:30:39 -0500
These are all good points to make the the FCC. I don't personally have any bias against the email-via-hf as a project. What I don't like is the side-step the official rules mentality that the interes
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00089.html (16,974 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:26:30 -0400
Jim, My point was that 'rude and selfish' points to owners of auto mailbox systems, whether they run PACTOR or some other mode. It's not all PACTOR users, just owners who clobber everyone with their
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00093.html (12,666 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella W4HM" <thomasfgiella@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:08:22 -0400
Yesterday evening I was on 20 meters working a DX station on RTTY. The frequency was 14082.000 kHz and a PACTOR station came on frequency and wiped out the QSO. Mark N8HOU you can try to gloss over t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00095.html (8,415 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:20:43 +0000
Well, I just did something I haven't done in a long time. I opened a Winlink client and updated the Pactor frequency lists. For whatever it's worth, I see: VE7RBH, a P4 node, at 14081.5 IQ9IL, a P4 n
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00096.html (9,732 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:18:28 -0500
Michael, the US stations can't connect to anything, US or not, that is wider than 500Hz outside the auto sub bands. I've seen US stations connect to Canadian nodes, P3 and W1600 out of US allocations
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00097.html (9,584 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:50:20 -0500
Michael, unless I misread your first post you specified DX nodes not individuals P2P. WG3G is not listed as having a 9Y designator so to connect to him it's just his US call, at least that's what the
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00098.html (9,664 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:27:02 -0400
Ron N0IA is running multiple copies of the server software on multiple radios and is running 500 Hz outside the wide band segments. I don't know about the other two. Matthew Pitts N8OHU _____________
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00099.html (10,768 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:39:31 -0500
Matthew, is he still listed as W1600 P3 on the frequencies outside the sub band? If he is some of the not so bright, push button for email, users will try it in those modes. Ron K0IDT N0IA is running
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00100.html (11,288 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:55:25 +0000 (UTC)
Ron, N0IA's not even listed in the software or on the website right now, but the last time I checked and he was showing in the software, he was listed as 500 Hz Pactor/Winmor outside the subband. Onl
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00101.html (12,964 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:09:48 -0500
Matthew, if I can get to the radio computer later I'll send you a screen shot of the last list I have from RMSx not the web site. It really doesn't matter, Winlink will never clean up their act, ARRL
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00102.html (13,444 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:22:59 -0500
Ron, have you heard any idea of the number of Winlink users? 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie Matthew, if I can get to the radio computer later I'll send you a screen shot of the
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00103.html (14,001 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:36:30 -0500
Jeff, I have no idea of current numbers. There is a stat page on Winlink.org that should have something current, number of users, message count and modes used. The web site used to claim 10,000+ sail
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00104.html (10,368 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 20:24:57 -0400
Jeff, Less than three thousand, but that is worldwide and including MARS and possibly SHARES users. Matthew Pitts N8OHU _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00105.html (15,707 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Pactor QRM To The Other Digital Modes (score: 1)
Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:05:36 -0500
Less than 3000?? That number sounds low Matthew but if you trust your source then I'll accept it. Ron K0IDT Less than three thousand, but that is worldwide and including MARS and possibly SHARES user
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-08/msg00106.html (9,982 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu