Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Pileup\s+of\s+Rookies\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Pileup\s+of\s+Rookies\!\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:06:22 -0500; Wow, what fun. Spending time in the Rookie Roundup RTTY and having fun with a small pileup of Rookies. Great to see all the new calls!!! Jump in and join the fun with 3 hours left! Everything has bee; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00243.html (7,101 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 17:23:13 -0400; I agree Don. Called CQ for a bit and got a few rookies and non-rookies which is fine too. MS is usually a tough state for me to find someone in and the second rookie I worked was from MS which is gre; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00245.html (7,931 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:33:35 -0800; I wish I could share Don's enthusiasm - unfortunately not so. Contest organizers who insist on limiting power output to 100W should be required to spend a couple of months in AK first to see just wha; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00249.html (10,606 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:47:55 -0500; Gary, From the 9-land hole and only a 55 foot tower... Me thinks thou protest too much.... ;O) Catch you in the next one. 73m Mike WB9B _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing li; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00250.html (7,169 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:32:43 -0500; I think the rules are confusing. In section 3 it says Non-Rookies only get credit when working Rookies. _*3) Entry Categories:*_ 3.2. Non-Rookies may call CQ, but can only work Rookie stations for co; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00251.html (12,792 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:35:45 -0800; Robert, I agree the rules need some more work. Rule 3.2 should clarify that if a Non-Rookie works a Non-Rookie neither station gets a QSO point, BUT either or both stations may get multiplier credit; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00252.html (9,684 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:56:11 -0700; I think that is a great idea, Gary. You're not going to win the silly thing anyway with a 100 watts from AK. This way you have fun, improve the contest experience for everyone and possibly give AK to; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00253.html (7,912 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:25:02 -0500; I set up the macros and saw the same thing and decided to do other things. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00256.html (7,868 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:00:27 -0400; I didn't notice any "ROOKIES ONLY" being sent but I was in the contest for just under 1 hour after starting late and shutting down as a huge storm rolled in. I myself sent "CQ ROOKIES K2DSL K2DSL CQ"; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00257.html (10,570 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:38:58 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I was one of those callind CQ ROOKIES ONLY, but it wasn't because I'm a mean old guy. :-) I interpreted the zero-point rule to mean that non-rookies should focus on working t; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00258.html (8,499 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:49:48 -0400; How did you setup N1MM? I had some spare time and hadn't completely scratched the contesting itch with my meager participation in SARTG. When I saw Don Hill's email I decided to jump in for a bit. An; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00260.html (11,821 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Larry Gauthier $K8UT$" <k8ut@k8ut.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:06:50 -0400; Gary (et al), Believe me, I share your frustration with the rules. I was one of the N1MM Logger team members testing our code to ensure we got the scoring to work properly, and we had a few email exc; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00262.html (13,375 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Larry Gauthier $K8UT$" <k8ut@k8ut.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:08:07 -0400; Al, You must not have downloaded the latest version of N1MM Logger. We revised it two weeks ago, based on scoring and rule feedback from the ARRL. -larry K8UT How did you setup N1MM? I had some spare; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00263.html (12,720 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:16:50 -0500; Al, Maybe you were using an older version of MM... when I first loaded the module (RRRTTY), the exchange area looked like the "auto detect" used in the SS contests. That's where you can enter the inf; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00264.html (14,517 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:20:23 -0700; I wish I could share Don's enthusiasm - unfortunately not so. Contest I often run high power in low-power contests and submit as check log. I follow the W6SX rule which says the first rule of contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00265.html (9,475 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:40:35 -0700; I think it all might be a moot point. In looking at the results, I see where 9 people submitted a score to 3830. Don't look like there is all that much interest, sad to say. Maybe if they didn't sche; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00266.html (10,033 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:12:24 -0800; Thanks Larry! I guess I will join the chorus of those who think the rules could be improved or at least more clearly stated. "Upon further review..." and a more through reading of rule 3.1.2 I agree; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00268.html (10,202 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:06:33 -0500; Immediately after SARTG ended I started calling CQ ROOKIES and there wasn't a RTTY signal anywhere on 20 meters. When I came back an hour later there were 20 or so signals on 20M RTTY. I made two con; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00270.html (12,023 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: "Ken Anderson, N0AS" <n0as.dx@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:27:04 -0500; I worked one 1x2 callsign that was a rookie. Think it was a K1, but don't remember for sure. I've been doing RTTY for just a couple of months and had a great time in the SARTG and RR. I should have p; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00271.html (13,278 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Pileup of Rookies! (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:13:54 -0400; That online tutorial is the nuts, isn't it? I got back into this hobby a few years ago after a 30+ year hiatus. One of the first operating activities I did after I got my ticket was November Sweepsta; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00274.html (10,539 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]