Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Please\s+file\s+your\s+comments\s+with\s+RM\-11708\s+with\s+teh\s+FCC\s+and\s+your\s+ARRL\s+Director\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Please file your comments with RM-11708 with teh FCC and your ARRL Director (score: 1)
Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:40:32 -0500
Folks, It's still not too late to file comments regarding RM-11708. Also please copy your directors on your comments. If anyone needs help in the filing, please let me know as I have helped a couple
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00120.html (12,655 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Please file your comments with RM-11708 with teh FCC and your ARRL Director (score: 1)
Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:42:05 -0400
Terry Under current FCC rules, the 300 baud limit does NOT limit bandwidth except for two-tone RTTY signals. Note for example that PACTOR-3 occupies 2.2 kHz and uses a baud rate of 100. There is no B
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00159.html (16,188 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Please file your comments with RM-11708 with teh FCC and your ARRL Director (score: 1)
Author: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 01:03:51 -0400
That is only true because neither the Commission or anyone else could have foreseen multiple tone FSK or channel equalization methods when the rules were written. That was still the case well into t
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00190.html (19,954 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu