Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QSO\s+B4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QSO\s+B4\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: f6irf@free.fr; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:04:23 +0200; Hi, Just in case, you missed it... I copied the following from Bob's post (5B4AGN/P3F) on 3830... QUOTE My weekend irritant was those folks who say "Worked before". It's time to realise, with compute; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00233.html (7,899 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: w2nra@optonline.net; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:40:44 -0400; Thanks, Patrick, for the tip. This was my first RTTY contest and it happened to me. An HB0 sent me a "QSO BR". I didn't know how to respond, so I didn't. You are absolutely right, the station wasn't; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00237.html (6,982 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:04:26 -0500 (CDT); Many stations seem to have me in their logs as N5UW or N9UWY/9 no matter how many times I re-rend the call, so don't feel *too* bad. :-) A write-up in NCJ about working dupes would be a good start, b; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00247.html (7,151 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Ekki Plicht <ep@plicht.de>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:06:10 +0200; We will be able to survive without that one QSO... I usually just work a dupe and let the software do the rest. When you called I was at the station and was a little bit surprised that the owner of t; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00255.html (8,059 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:06:58 +0000; Along with the other comments which say, "work them", I'd like to add one more. I always consider the possibility that "I" screwed up, and didn't enter the correct call in the first place. Better to; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00256.html (7,490 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: W0YR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:32:25 EDT; Can someone please explain how the mighty Cabrillo can figure out which of two QSOs with another station is the one to discard? Just trusting Cabrillo to get it right is like trusting CBS. I worked K; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00273.html (7,791 bytes)
7. RE: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <ve3xd@rogers.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:49:47 -0400; Mike, I'm with you. I generally respond with QSO B4 and then manually give the time of the Q. Most usually accept that and when I'm on the other end of that exchange can usually determine what I did; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00276.html (8,769 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "roofus" <roofus@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:15:40 -0400; I'm not so sure of your "MANUALLY entering callsigns" statement. There were a number of occasions where WriteLog (RTTYRITE) did not pick up the /? after a call and I had to manually input it. But I'm; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00277.html (7,883 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:14:40 -0700; _________________________________________________________ I had to manually enter the /x on several calls during the contest and I'm wondering why the stations sent the /x in the first place? It's no; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00293.html (8,351 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:25:42 -0700; _________________________________________________________ Patrick is right, I know it in my heart, but I can picture any number of stations duping people right and left without a clue as to the fact; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00294.html (8,750 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:46:16 -0000; and Because the friend.ini file doesn't waste enough time? Barry W2UP-- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club _____________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00299.html (8,165 bytes)
12. RE: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Schulz Jonathan <jonathan.schulz@siemens.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:57:33 -0500; Because if they don't and the software defaults a Zone 3 for W6xxx (who is W6xxx/4 and is in Zone 5) and in the heat of the run I don't change the zone (My responsibility to log what sent not what as; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00300.html (8,377 bytes)
13. RE: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Martin - MM0BQI" <MM0BQI@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:23:21 +0100; Why Do it? One reason is that if you don't log the correct suffix the LOTW will bomb out the QSO and it will not match up! Having just processed 1000 QSL cards from previous IOTA DXpeditions I would; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00301.html (9,703 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: "roofus" <roofus@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:43:49 -0400; Being new to the RTTY game and contesting in general I have decided not to use the friend.ini file although there were many mixed opinions on the subject. I do know there were a few stations that ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00302.html (8,567 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:10:45 -0500; Instead of friends.ini isn't it the super check partial file that is the culprit here. 73 Larry L W0ETC W0ETC Larry L _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00307.html (8,817 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: f6irf@free.fr; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:54:48 +0200; Hi everybody It may surprise you but I do agree with Dennis... My new approach, based on a few contests experience, is the following: - If I am calling, I may pass the name in the QSL message (ie "QS; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00311.html (10,099 bytes)
17. RE: [RTTY] QSO B4 (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:05:24 -0700 (PDT); You have to log what was sent. Every W4 station in AL, KY and TN is in Zone 4. Same goes with WV in Zone 5, and WY in Zone 4. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford,; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00320.html (8,775 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]