Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Bandwidth\.\s+Was\:\s+18\s+Mhz\s+Band\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Bandwidth\.\s+Was\:\s+18\s+Mhz\s+Band\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Bandwidth. Was: 18 Mhz Band (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:55:43 -0700; I did a bit of literature search and there are some conflicting numbers out there regarding "occupied bandwidth." The ARRL Web site's DominoEX page (http://www.arrl.org/domino) cites a bandwidth of 4; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00065.html (12,702 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Bandwidth. Was: 18 Mhz Band (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:24:51 -0400; Chen, Thanks for the empirical confirmation. When I posted my original reply the 340 Hz value was from memory rather than bothering to consult the ITU (also NTIA "Appendix J") documents. For the bene; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00066.html (15,392 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Bandwidth. Was: 18 Mhz Band (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:19:52 -0700; By the way, just because the occupied bandwidth of RTTY is in the region of 250 Hz to 270 Hz (depending on the number of stop bits), it does not mean that you can fit 10 RTTY signals into a 2.5 kHz p; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00067.html (8,618 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Bandwidth. Was: 18 Mhz Band (score: 1): Author: W2GR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 16:35:58 -0400 (EDT); With all the crap we hear on the bands these days....I have to wonder...does the FCC even care?......anymore?... Just an observation.... Mike W2GR -- In a message dated 4/9/2012 4:19:31 P.M. Eastern; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-04/msg00068.html (6,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]